Literature DB >> 12061624

Suspects, lies, and videotape: an analysis of authentic high-stake liars.

Samantha Mann1, Aldert Vrij, Ray Bull.   

Abstract

This study is one of the very few, and the most extensive to date, which has examined deceptive behavior in a real-life, high-stakes setting. The behavior of 16 suspects in their police interviews has been analyzed. Clips of video footage have been selected where other sources (reliable witness statements and forensic evidence) provide evidence that the suspect lied or told the truth. Truthful and deceptive behaviors were compared. The suspects blinked less frequently and made longer pauses during deceptive clips than during truthful clips. Eye contact was maintained equally for deceptive and truthful clips. These findings negate the popular belief amongst both laypersons and professional lie detectors (such as the police) that liars behave nervously by fidgeting and avoiding eye contact. However, large individual differences were present.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061624     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015332606792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Law Hum Behav        ISSN: 0147-7307


  8 in total

1.  Markers of deception in italian speech.

Authors:  Katelyn Spence; Gina Villar; Joanne Arciuli
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-10-30

2.  In the blink of an eye: neural responses elicited to viewing the eye blinks of another individual.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; Michael E Berrebi; Marie E McNeely; Amy L Prostko; Aina Puce
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Detecting deception via eyeblink frequency modulation.

Authors:  Brandon S Perelman
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Comparing a Perceptual and an Automated Vision-Based Method for Lie Detection in Younger Children.

Authors:  Mariana Serras Pereira; Reinier Cozijn; Eric Postma; Suleman Shahid; Marc Swerts
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-12-12

5.  Speech timing cues reveal deceptive speech in social deduction board games.

Authors:  Ziyun Zhang; Carolyn McGettigan; Michel Belyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Modulation of untruthful responses with non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Shirley Fecteau; Paulo Boggio; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.157

7.  Effects of social gaze on visual-spatial imagination.

Authors:  Heather Buchanan; Lucy Markson; Emma Bertrand; Sian Greaves; Reena Parmar; Kevin B Paterson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-04

8.  Strong, but Wrong: Lay People's and Police Officers' Beliefs about Verbal and Nonverbal Cues to Deception.

Authors:  Glynis Bogaard; Ewout H Meijer; Aldert Vrij; Harald Merckelbach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.