Literature DB >> 12061490

The contingent ranking method--a feasible and valid method when eliciting preferences for health care?

Ulla Slothuus1, Mette L Larsen, Peter Junker.   

Abstract

The Contingent Ranking Method--a feasible and valid method when eliciting preferences for health care? The objective of the study was to determine the feasibility and validity of the contingent ranking method, when eliciting preferences and measuring willingness to pay for health care. A measurement experiment based on ranking data is reported. Marginal willingness to pay for alleviation of rheumatoid arthritis symptoms that may be the outcome of a treatment with a novel anti-rheumatic agent, cA2 (now called TNF-alpha blockade) was calculated. The estimated marginal willingness to pay value was 650 DKK ($93). With regard to the health status variables and income variable the signs of the coefficients were, as expected, positive. The contingent ranking method is a feasible and valid method for eliciting preferences and determining willingness to pay estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12061490     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00139-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  5 in total

Review 1.  A 'league table' of contingent valuation results for pharmaceutical interventions: a hard pill to swallow?

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; Richard D Smith; David K Whynes
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Economics of stratified medicine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sean Gavan; Mark Harrison; Cynthia Iglesias; Anne Barton; Andrea Manca; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.592

3.  The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?

Authors:  Linda N Douma; Ellen Uiters; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills.

Authors:  Nicolien C Zwijnenberg; Michelle Hendriks; Olga C Damman; Evelien Bloemendal; Sonja Wendel; Judith D de Jong; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Engaging adolescents in tuberculosis and clinical trial research through drama.

Authors:  Bey-Marrié Schmidt; Amber Abrams; Michele Tameris
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.