Literature DB >> 12060426

Supracrestal soft tissue preservation with enamel matrix proteins in treatment of deep intrabony defects.

Leonardo Trombelli1, Sabrina Bottega, Giovanni Zucchelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effectiveness of a regenerative procedure based on supracrestal soft tissue preservation in association with enamel matrix proteins (EMP) in the treatment of deep intrabony defects.
METHODS: The subjects included 35 consecutively treated patients, 23 females and 12 males, aged 28-61 years, 11 of whom were smokers. Patients presented with at least one intrabony defect with probing pocket depth > or = 6 mm and a radiographic depth of the defect > or = 4 mm at the initial visit. Immediately before surgery and 9-12 months after surgery, Local Plaque Score (LPS), Local Bleeding Score (LBS), probing pocket depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession (REC), and radiographic depth of the defect (DEPTH) were recorded.
RESULTS: Thirty-one (88.6%) defects were LPS-negative presurgery, while 29 (82.9%) defects presented with no plaque postsurgery. The prevalence of LBS-positive defects shifted from 94.3% presurgery to 8.4% postsurgery (p < 0.0000). PPD was 8.9 mm before surgery, and decreased to 3.5 mm postsurgery (p < 0.0000). CAL varied from 10.1 mm presurgery to 5.4 mm postsurgery (p < 0.0000), with an average improvement (gain) of 4.7 +/- 1.7 mm. Twenty-six (74.3%) defects presented a gain of least 4 mm. Regression analysis showed a positive correlation between CAL gain as a dependent variable, and presurgery PPD and amount of supracrestal soft tissues as predictors. DEPTH improvement (gain) was 3.9 +/- 1.8 mm, which represented 65% of defect fill. Twenty (57.1%) defects presented a DEPTH gain of at least 4 mm. DEPTH gain was significantly correlated to presurgery PPD (p < 0.000). No significant differences were found between smokers and non-smokers in terms of CAL and DEPTH gain.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from the present study indicated that the regenerative procedure based on supracrestal soft tissue preservation and EMP application leads to clinically and statistically significant improvement of hard and soft tissue conditions of deep intrabony defects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12060426     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-051x.2002.290508.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Periodontol        ISSN: 0303-6979            Impact factor:   8.728


  5 in total

1.  Clinical effects of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite paste in the treatment of intrabony periodontal defects: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Bernd Heinz; Adrian Kasaj; Marie Teich; Søren Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Efficacy of Connective Tissue with and without Periosteum in Regeneration of Intrabony Defects.

Authors:  Vahid Esfahanian; Hedayatollah Golestaneh; Omid Moghaddas; Mohammad Reza Ghafari
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2014-12-03

3.  Cellular viability and genetic expression of human gingival fibroblasts to zirconia with enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain®).

Authors:  Yong-Dae Kwon; Hyun-Jung Choi; Heesu Lee; Jung-Woo Lee; Hans-Peter Weber; Ahran Pae
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 1.904

4.  Periodontal regenerative therapy with enamel matrix derivative in the treatment of intrabony defects: a prospective 2-year study.

Authors:  Fumi Seshima; Hideto Aoki; Takahiro Takeuchi; Eiichi Suzuki; Daisuke Irokawa; Asako Makino-Oi; Hiroki Sugito; Sachiyo Tomita; Atsushi Saito
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-07-06

5.  Long-term clinical outcomes of periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative: A retrospective cohort study with a mean follow-up of 10 years.

Authors:  Siro P De Ry; Andrea Roccuzzo; Niklaus P Lang; Anton Sculean; Giovanni E Salvi
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.494

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.