Literature DB >> 12060327

The rotational technique with a partially inflated laryngeal mask airway improves the ease of insertion in children.

Shin Nakayama1, Yoshiko Osaka, Masao Yamashita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study compared the ease of insertion of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with a partially inflated cuff using the standard 'nonrotational' technique versus the rotational technique.
METHODS: One hundred and forty-five children undergoing anaesthesia using the LMA were randomly assigned to either method. The cuff was partially inflated in both groups. The ease of insertion was assessed by the time taken to complete the LMA insertion, the number of attempts before successful placement and the occurrence of complications.
RESULTS: The success rate of insertion at the first attempt was higher in the rotational technique group (99% versus 79%, P < 0.05). All patients in the rotational group had the mask inserted within two attempts. On the other hand, three patients had the mask inserted on the first attempt with the rotational technique after three unsuccessful attempts by an anaesthesiologist with the standard 'nonrotational' technique. Insertion technique made no difference on insertion time.
CONCLUSIONS: The rotational technique was associated with a higher success rate for insertion and a lower incidence of complications in children. Using the rotational technique with a partially inflated cuff could be the first-choice approach in paediatric patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12060327     DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2002.00847.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth        ISSN: 1155-5645            Impact factor:   2.556


  11 in total

Review 1.  [Laryngeal masks. Possibilities and limits].

Authors:  H Hillebrand; J Motsch
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  A new technique for laryngeal mask airway insertion in a newborn with pierre-robin syndrome: a case report.

Authors:  Haci Ahmet Alici; Mehmet Cesur; Rahmi Ors; Ayhan Tastekin; Yusuf Tuzun
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2008-12

3.  A Prospective Randomised Clinical Trial for the Comparison of Two Techniques for the Insertion of Proseal Laryngeal Mask Airway in Adults-Index Finger Insertion Technique versus 90° Rotation Technique.

Authors:  Pavan V Dhulkhed; Sunil V Khyadi; Parbati B Jamale; Vithal K Dhulkhed
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2017-04-01

4.  Comparison of Four Different Supraglottic Airway Devices in Terms of Efficacy, Intra-ocular Pressure and Haemodynamic Parameters in Children Undergoing Ophthalmic Surgery.

Authors:  Gökhan Peker; Suna Akın Takmaz; Bülent Baltacı; Hülya Başar; Mustafa Kotanoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2015-08-21

5.  Airway management using LMA-evaluation of three insertional techniques-a prospective randomised study.

Authors:  T Shyam; Venkatesh Selvaraj
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

6.  Laryngeal mask airway insertion in adults: comparison between fully deflated and partially inflated technique.

Authors:  Jiwon An; Seo Kyung Shin; Ki Jun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  A simple method of partial inflation of the LMA cuff before insertion in children to allow cuff pressure without adjustment after insertion.

Authors:  Bo-Eun Moon; Min-Soo Kim; Jeong Rim Lee
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-06-19

8.  Propofol for laryngeal mask airway insertion in children: Effect of two different doses.

Authors:  Mahin Seyedhejazi; Mahmoud Eydi; Morteza Ghojazadeh; Aref Nejati; Kamyar Ghabili; Samad Ej Golzari; Afshin Iranpour
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07

Review 9.  Ambulatory anesthetic care in children undergoing myringotomy and tube placement: current perspectives.

Authors:  Hal Robinson; Thomas Engelhardt
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2017-04-19

Review 10.  Standard versus Rotation Technique for Insertion of Supraglottic Airway Devices: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Ha Park; Jong Seok Lee; Sang Beom Nam; Jin Wu Ju; Min Soo Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.