M S Hagge1, R D M Wong, J S Lindemuth. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of the Pacific, San Francisco, California 94115, USA. mhagge@sf.uop.edu
Abstract
AIM: This investigation examined what effect three different sealers had on retention of endodontic posts (Parapost) luted with a resin cement (Panavia 21 OP). METHODOLOGY: Sixty-four single-rooted teeth were decoronated, filed, cleaned, and shaped with a size 5 Gates-Glidden drill and 0.12 taper G.T. rotary instrumentation (Dentsply/Tulsa Dental). Teeth were then divided into four groups of 16 each. Group 1 was not obturated, and served as a control. The other three groups were obturated with gutta-percha using a different sealer for each group. Group 2 used a eugenol containing sealer (Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer), group 3 a resin sealer (AH-26), and group 4 a calcium hydroxide sealer (Sealapex). After 1 week's storage at 100% humidity, 10-mm deep post spaces were prepared with a size 6 Gates-Glidden drill, and size 5 Paraposts were cemented. Following 48 h of storage, samples were mounted in a PVC pipe with acrylic, and the posts were removed vertically using a universal testing machine at 1 mm min-, with data recorded in kilograms. RESULTS: The mean values of force required to remove the posts were: group 1 = 61.80, SD = 16.21; group 2 = 43.14, SD = 14.66; group 3 = 48.54, SD = 17.84; group 4 = 53.52, SD = 18.77. Using anova and Bonferroni tests, group 1 demonstrated significantly greater mean retention strength values than group 2, but no other significant differences existed between groups. CONCLUSION: The chemical formulation of root canal sealers did not significantly affect the retention of endodontic posts luted with resin cement.
RCT Entities:
AIM: This investigation examined what effect three different sealers had on retention of endodontic posts (Parapost) luted with a resin cement (Panavia 21 OP). METHODOLOGY: Sixty-four single-rooted teeth were decoronated, filed, cleaned, and shaped with a size 5 Gates-Glidden drill and 0.12 taper G.T. rotary instrumentation (Dentsply/Tulsa Dental). Teeth were then divided into four groups of 16 each. Group 1 was not obturated, and served as a control. The other three groups were obturated with gutta-percha using a different sealer for each group. Group 2 used a eugenol containing sealer (Kerr Pulp Canal Sealer), group 3 a resin sealer (AH-26), and group 4 a calcium hydroxide sealer (Sealapex). After 1 week's storage at 100% humidity, 10-mm deep post spaces were prepared with a size 6 Gates-Glidden drill, and size 5 Paraposts were cemented. Following 48 h of storage, samples were mounted in a PVC pipe with acrylic, and the posts were removed vertically using a universal testing machine at 1 mm min-, with data recorded in kilograms. RESULTS: The mean values of force required to remove the posts were: group 1 = 61.80, SD = 16.21; group 2 = 43.14, SD = 14.66; group 3 = 48.54, SD = 17.84; group 4 = 53.52, SD = 18.77. Using anova and Bonferroni tests, group 1 demonstrated significantly greater mean retention strength values than group 2, but no other significant differences existed between groups. CONCLUSION: The chemical formulation of root canal sealers did not significantly affect the retention of endodontic posts luted with resin cement.