Literature DB >> 12058161

Learning and support preferences of adult patients with cancer at a comprehensive cancer center.

Jane Harper Chelf1, Amy M B Deshler, Kay M B Thiemann, Ann Marie Dose, Susan K Quella, Shauna Hillman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To identify content items for an inclusive education curriculum for adult patients with cancer, as well as describe their learning and support preferences, determine the level of information provided to them, and assess the patients' interest in potential new services.
DESIGN: Exploratory, descriptive survey research.
SETTING: A National Cancer Institute-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center. SAMPLE: All consenting adult patients with cancer who had appointments in the outpatient care setting during a two-week period (N = 1,310).
METHODS: A 3-phase study identified core components of an inclusive educational curriculum, conducted structured interviews of patients with cancer, and validated findings in a selected sample.
FINDINGS: The surveys were completed and returned by 48% (n = 625) of the patients. The most favored method for learning about all cancer topics was discussions with physicians (66%). Other preferred methods included brochures or booklets provided by physicians or nurses (33%), discussions with nurses (34%), self-selecting print media from information displays (20%), and talking with other patients with cancer (14%). Statistically significant differences in learning preferences were found among subgroups defined by age, gender, and education.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients preferred interactive, interpersonal communication with physicians or nurses. In addition, the prevailing method of education delivery for patients with cancer was providing print materials that support and enhance knowledge shared in the patient-healthcare team communication. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: This study confirms the importance of the learning and support preferences of patients with cancer. To implement a successful education program for their patients, nurses must be aware of patients' preferences for learning new information. Time must be set aside for one-on-one communication with patients, and print materials must be easily accessible to healthcare providers to support the patient-education process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12058161     DOI: 10.1188/02.ONF.863-867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  5 in total

1.  Developing and implementing a local education and support program for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

Authors:  Marilee Kuhrik; Nancy S Kuhrik; Teresa L Deshields; JoAnn O'Neill; Beth Zubal
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Evaluation of a hospital-based cancer information and support centre.

Authors:  Nicole A Kinnane
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Barriers to seeking cancer information among Spanish-speaking cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sharon Watkins Davis; Marynieves Diaz-Mendez; Maria Talosig Garcia
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Developing patient education to enhance recovery after colorectal surgery through action research: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fiona Poland; Nicola Spalding; Sheila Gregory; Jane McCulloch; Kevin Sargen; Penny Vicary
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 5.  Promoting lung cancer awareness, help-seeking and early detection: a systematic review of interventions.

Authors:  Mohamad M Saab; Serena FitzGerald; Brendan Noonan; Caroline Kilty; Abigail Collins; Áine Lyng; Una Kennedy; Maidy O'Brien; Josephine Hegarty
Journal:  Health Promot Int       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 2.483

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.