OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) and AD on entorhinal cortex (ERC) and hippocampus. METHODS: Thirty-eight cognitively normal subjects, 18 patients with SIVD, and 22 patients with AD were included. Volumes of ERC and hippocampus were manually measured based on MRI. Global cerebral changes of cortical gray matter, subcortical gray matter, white matter, sulcal CSF, ventricular CSF (vCSF), and white matter signal hyperintensities (WMSH) were assessed. RESULTS: Patients with SIVD had 21.7% (p < 0.01) smaller ERC and 18.2% (p < 0.01) smaller hippocampi than cognitively normal subjects and 24.4% (p < 0.01) larger ERC and 11.1% (p < 0.05) larger hippocampi than patients with AD. In addition, patients with SIVD had less cortical gray matter and white matter and more vCSF and WMSH (all p < 0.01) than cognitively normal subjects and more vCSF and WMSH (p < 0.01) than patients with AD. The volumes of ERC and hippocampus were positively correlated to similar extents (p < 0.01) in SIVD and AD. Cortical gray matter loss was positively correlated (p < 0.01) with hippocampal atrophy, but not with ERC atrophy, in SIVD and AD. Hippocampal volume alone could classify 82% of patients with SIVD from cognitively normal subjects and 63% of patients with SIVD from subjects with AD. Adding global cerebral changes to hippocampus substantially improved the classification to 96% between patients with SIVD and cognitively normal subjects and 83% between subjects with SIVD and those with AD, whereas adding ERC change to hippocampus did not significantly improve the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: The entorhinal cortex and hippocampus are less affected by subcortical ischemic vascular dementia than by AD.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of subcortical ischemic vascular dementia (SIVD) and AD on entorhinal cortex (ERC) and hippocampus. METHODS: Thirty-eight cognitively normal subjects, 18 patients with SIVD, and 22 patients with AD were included. Volumes of ERC and hippocampus were manually measured based on MRI. Global cerebral changes of cortical gray matter, subcortical gray matter, white matter, sulcal CSF, ventricular CSF (vCSF), and white matter signal hyperintensities (WMSH) were assessed. RESULTS:Patients with SIVD had 21.7% (p < 0.01) smaller ERC and 18.2% (p < 0.01) smaller hippocampi than cognitively normal subjects and 24.4% (p < 0.01) larger ERC and 11.1% (p < 0.05) larger hippocampi than patients with AD. In addition, patients with SIVD had less cortical gray matter and white matter and more vCSF and WMSH (all p < 0.01) than cognitively normal subjects and more vCSF and WMSH (p < 0.01) than patients with AD. The volumes of ERC and hippocampus were positively correlated to similar extents (p < 0.01) in SIVD and AD. Cortical gray matter loss was positively correlated (p < 0.01) with hippocampal atrophy, but not with ERC atrophy, in SIVD and AD. Hippocampal volume alone could classify 82% of patients with SIVD from cognitively normal subjects and 63% of patients with SIVD from subjects with AD. Adding global cerebral changes to hippocampus substantially improved the classification to 96% between patients with SIVD and cognitively normal subjects and 83% between subjects with SIVD and those with AD, whereas adding ERC change to hippocampus did not significantly improve the discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: The entorhinal cortex and hippocampus are less affected by subcortical ischemic vascular dementia than by AD.
Authors: A T Du; N Schuff; D Amend; M P Laakso; Y Y Hsu; W J Jagust; K Yaffe; J H Kramer; B Reed; D Norman; H C Chui; M W Weiner Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: G Fein; V Di Sclafani; J Tanabe; V Cardenas; M W Weiner; W J Jagust; B R Reed; D Norman; N Schuff; L Kusdra; T Greenfield; H Chui Journal: Neurology Date: 2000-12-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Y Zhang; N Schuff; G-H Jahng; W Bayne; S Mori; L Schad; S Mueller; A-T Du; J H Kramer; K Yaffe; H Chui; W J Jagust; B L Miller; M W Weiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2007-01-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Hee Jin Kim; Jeonghun Kim; Hanna Cho; Byoung Seok Ye; Cindy W Yoon; Young Noh; Geon Ha Kim; Jae Hong Lee; Jae Seung Kim; Yearn Seong Choe; Kyung-Han Lee; Chang-Hun Kim; Sang Won Seo; Michael W Weiner; Duk L Na; Joon-Kyung Seong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-10-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mark W Logue; Holly Posner; Richard C Green; Margaret Moline; L Adrienne Cupples; Katherine L Lunetta; Heng Zou; Stephen W Hurt; Lindsay A Farrer; Charles Decarli Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2011-07-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Yuan Xu; Daniel J Valentino; Ann I Scher; Ivo Dinov; Lon R White; Paul M Thompson; Lenore J Launer; Arthur W Toga Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-12-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: S S Staekenborg; E C W van Straaten; W M van der Flier; R Lane; F Barkhof; P Scheltens Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: N Schuff; A A Capizzano; A T Du; D L Amend; J O'Neill; D Norman; W J Jagust; H C Chui; J H Kramer; B R Reed; B L Miller; K Yaffe; M W Weiner Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-08-12 Impact factor: 9.910