OBJECTIVE: To examine social support and peer and family involvement in relation to diabetes management within a developmental context. METHODS: Sixty-eight youths ages 8 to 17 diagnosed with type 1 diabetes participated. This study represents the phase 1 data from a multisystemic, home-based intervention. Data included parent and youth report of disease management and conflict, youth-reported perceptions of support, peer participation in the intervention, and HbA1c. RESULTS: Adolescents perceived greater diabetes-related peer support than did school-age children. Perceived peer and family support were not correlated with metabolic control. Peer participation in the intervention was correlated with metabolic control. CONCLUSIONS: There is a developmental shift in perceptions of peer support. Increased perceptions of peer and family support overall may not result in improved metabolic control. Social support interventions should focus on the types of support that are most highly associated with positive health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To examine social support and peer and family involvement in relation to diabetes management within a developmental context. METHODS: Sixty-eight youths ages 8 to 17 diagnosed with type 1 diabetes participated. This study represents the phase 1 data from a multisystemic, home-based intervention. Data included parent and youth report of disease management and conflict, youth-reported perceptions of support, peer participation in the intervention, and HbA1c. RESULTS: Adolescents perceived greater diabetes-related peer support than did school-age children. Perceived peer and family support were not correlated with metabolic control. Peer participation in the intervention was correlated with metabolic control. CONCLUSIONS: There is a developmental shift in perceptions of peer support. Increased perceptions of peer and family support overall may not result in improved metabolic control. Social support interventions should focus on the types of support that are most highly associated with positive health outcomes.
Authors: Heather D Lehmkuhl; Lisa J Merlo; Katie Devine; Jared Gaines; Eric A Storch; Janet H Silverstein; Gary R Geffken Journal: J Clin Psychol Med Settings Date: 2009-04-22
Authors: Margaret Grey; Robin Whittemore; Sarah Jaser; Jodie Ambrosino; Evie Lindemann; Lauren Liberti; Veronika Northrup; James Dziura Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.228