Literature DB >> 12057597

A dilemma for mucosal vaccination: efficacy versus toxicity using enterotoxin-based adjuvants.

Kohtaro Fujihashi1, Toshiya Koga, Frederik W van Ginkel, Yukari Hagiwara, Jerry R McGhee.   

Abstract

In the development of mucosal vaccines, cholera toxin (CT) has been shown to be an effective adjuvant and to induce both mucosal and systemic immune responses via a Th2 cell-dependent pathway. However, a major concern for use of mucosal adjuvants such as CT is that this molecule is not suitable for use in humans because of its innate toxicity. Recent vaccine development efforts have emphasized nasal application of antigen and CT for the induction of mucosal IgA responses. When we examined potential toxicity of CT for the central nervous system (CNS), both CT and CT-B accumulated in the olfactory nerves/epithelium and olfactory bulbs of mice when given by the nasal route. The development of effective mucosal vaccines for the elderly is also an important issue; however, only limited information is available. When mucosal adjuvanticity of CT was evaluated in aged mice, an early immune dysregulation was evident in the mucosal immune system. The present review discusses these potential problems for effective mucosal vaccine development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12057597     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00155-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  59 in total

1.  Non-parenteral vaccines.

Authors:  Alain Li Wan Po
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-10

Review 2.  Mucosal immunity: overcoming the barrier for induction of proximal responses.

Authors:  Brent S McKenzie; Jamie L Brady; Andrew M Lew
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.829

3.  Rectal immunization with rotavirus virus-like particles induces systemic and mucosal humoral immune responses and protects mice against rotavirus infection.

Authors:  Nathalie Parez; Cynthia Fourgeux; Ali Mohamed; Catherine Dubuquoy; Mathieu Pillot; Axelle Dehee; Annie Charpilienne; Didier Poncet; Isabelle Schwartz-Cornil; Antoine Garbarg-Chenon
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 4.  Chitosan: a promising safe and immune-enhancing adjuvant for intranasal vaccines.

Authors:  Alan Smith; Michael Perelman; Michael Hinchcliffe
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Mucosal vaccines: recent progress in understanding the natural barriers.

Authors:  Olga Borges; Filipa Lebre; Dulce Bento; Gerrit Borchard; Hans E Junginger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 6.  Oral delivery of human biopharmaceuticals, autoantigens and vaccine antigens bioencapsulated in plant cells.

Authors:  Kwang-Chul Kwon; Dheeraj Verma; Nameirakpam D Singh; Roland Herzog; Henry Daniell
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 15.470

7.  Administration of a probiotic associated with nasal vaccination with inactivated Lactococcus lactis-PppA induces effective protection against pneumoccocal infection in young mice.

Authors:  E Vintiñi; J Villena; S Alvarez; M Medina
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Sublingual administration of bacteria-expressed influenza virus hemagglutinin 1 (HA1) induces protection against infection with 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus.

Authors:  Byoung-Shik Shim; Jung-Ah Choi; Ho-Hyun Song; Sung-Moo Park; In Su Cheon; Ji-Eun Jang; Sun Je Woo; Chung Hwan Cho; Min-Suk Song; Hyemi Kim; Kyung Joo Song; Jae Myun Lee; Suhng Wook Kim; Dae Sub Song; Young Ki Choi; Jae-Ouk Kim; Huan Huu Nguyen; Dong Wook Kim; Young Yil Bahk; Cheol-Heui Yun; Man Ki Song
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 3.422

9.  Intranasal immunization with influenza VLPs incorporating membrane-anchored flagellin induces strong heterosubtypic protection.

Authors:  Bao-Zhong Wang; Rui Xu; Fu-Shi Quan; Sang-Moo Kang; Li Wang; Richard W Compans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Intranasal delivery of influenza subunit vaccine formulated with GEM particles as an adjuvant.

Authors:  Vinay Saluja; Jean P Amorij; Maarten L van Roosmalen; Kees Leenhouts; Anke Huckriede; Wouter L J Hinrichs; Henderik W Frijlink
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.