Literature DB >> 12057557

Cost-effectiveness of screening for the factor V Leiden mutation in pregnant women.

Peter Clark1, Sara Twaddle, Isobel D Walker, Linda Scott, Ian A Greer.   

Abstract

The factor V Leiden (FVL) mutation is associated with vascular complications in pregnancy, and routine screening of all pregnant women has been suggested. We did a prospective, unselected study in 967 pregnant women to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of screening all women, or only those with a personal or family history of venous thrombosis (n=113). When anticoagulant prophylaxis was assumed to effect a 50% reduction in vascular complications, we recorded an additional management cost of 3768 pounds sterling with selective screening and 39,841 pounds sterling with universal screening. This additional cost would result in prevention of less than one and three vascular events,respectively. Our findings, therefore, suggest that screening of pregnant women for the FVL mutation is not cost-effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12057557     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08740-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  7 in total

1.  Family history of venous thromboembolism and identifying factor V Leiden carriers during pregnancy.

Authors:  Amanda L Horton; Valerija Momirova; Donna Dizon-Townson; Katharine Wenstrom; George Wendel; Philip Samuels; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; Margaret Cotroneo; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Deborah Conway; Ronald J Wapner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  The cost-benefit ratio of screening pregnant women for thrombophilia.

Authors:  Gian Luca Salvagno; Giuseppe Lippi; Massimo Franchini; Giovanni Targher; Martina Montagnana; Massimo Franchi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Impact of smoking during pregnancy on functional coagulation testing.

Authors:  Donna Dizon-Townson; Connie Miller; Valerija Momirova; Baha Sibai; Catherine Y Spong; George Wendel; Katharine Wenstrom; Philip Samuels; Steve Caritis; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Mary J O'Sullivan; Deborah Conway; Ronald J Wapner; Steven G Gabbe
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Genetic testing in the European Union: does economic evaluation matter?

Authors:  Fernando Antoñanzas; R Rodríguez-Ibeas; M F Hutter; R Lorente; C Juárez; M Pinillos
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-05-20

Review 5.  A systematic review of cost-effectiveness analysis of screening interventions for assessing the risk of venous thromboembolism in women considering combined oral contraceptives.

Authors:  Zanfina Ademi; C Simone Sutherland; Joris Van Stiphout; Jöelle Michaud; Goranka Tanackovic; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Hereditary risk factors for thrombophilia and probability of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium.

Authors:  Andrea Gerhardt; Rüdiger E Scharf; Ian A Greer; Rainer B Zotz
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Cerebrovascular Disease in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Michael A. Sloan; Barney J. Stern
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Neurol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.598

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.