P Servaes1, S Verhagen, G Bleijenberg. 1. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. P.Servaes@cksmps.azn.nl
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality of life after cancer treatment becomes more important as the number of long-term survivors increases. This study aimed to investigate complaints of fatigue after treatment for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study patients were 150 women who had finished curative treatment for breast cancer by a mean of 29 months before commencement of this study. Measurements included computerised questionnaires and a daily Self-Observation List. RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the sample were severely fatigued, compared with 11% in a matched sample of women without a history of cancer. No association was found between fatigue and former treatment. The 'severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patient' scored more 'problematic' on psychological well-being, functional impairment, sleep disturbance, physical activity, social support, neuropsychological and social functioning compared with the 'non-severely fatigued disease-free breast cancer patient'. Furthermore, the severely fatigued patients had a lower sense of control with respect to their fatigue complaints and stronger breast cancer- and psychologically-related attributions with regard to the causes of fatigue compared with the non-severely fatigued patients. Regression analyses indicated that sleep disturbance, physical activity and causal attributions contributed significantly to the subjective experience of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Severe fatigue is a problem for almost 40% of the sample of breast cancer survivors. Severe fatigue is related to physical, psychological, social, cognitive and behavioural factors.
BACKGROUND: Quality of life after cancer treatment becomes more important as the number of long-term survivors increases. This study aimed to investigate complaints of fatigue after treatment for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study patients were 150 women who had finished curative treatment for breast cancer by a mean of 29 months before commencement of this study. Measurements included computerised questionnaires and a daily Self-Observation List. RESULTS: Thirty-eight per cent of the sample were severely fatigued, compared with 11% in a matched sample of women without a history of cancer. No association was found between fatigue and former treatment. The 'severely fatigued disease-free breast cancerpatient' scored more 'problematic' on psychological well-being, functional impairment, sleep disturbance, physical activity, social support, neuropsychological and social functioning compared with the 'non-severely fatigued disease-free breast cancerpatient'. Furthermore, the severely fatigued patients had a lower sense of control with respect to their fatigue complaints and stronger breast cancer- and psychologically-related attributions with regard to the causes of fatigue compared with the non-severely fatigued patients. Regression analyses indicated that sleep disturbance, physical activity and causal attributions contributed significantly to the subjective experience of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS:Severe fatigue is a problem for almost 40% of the sample of breast cancer survivors. Severe fatigue is related to physical, psychological, social, cognitive and behavioural factors.
Authors: Karin Struik; Martin Klein; Jan J Heimans; Marieke F Gielissen; Gijs Bleijenberg; Martin J Taphoorn; Jaap C Reijneveld; Tjeerd J Postma Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-12-09 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Heather S L Jim; Kelly A Hyland; Ashley M Nelson; Javier Pinilla-Ibarz; Kendra Sweet; Marieke Gielissen; Hailey Bulls; Aasha I Hoogland; Paul B Jacobsen; Hans Knoop Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Anand Dhruva; Marylin Dodd; Steven M Paul; Bruce A Cooper; Kathryn Lee; Claudia West; Bradley E Aouizerat; Patrick S Swift; William Wara; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Niilo Färkkilä; Saku Torvinen; Risto P Roine; Harri Sintonen; Juha Hänninen; Kimmo Taari; Tiina Saarto Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-11-01 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Floortje K Ploos van Amstel; Sanne W van den Berg; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Marieke F M Gielissen; Judith B Prins; Petronella B Ottevanger Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2013-03-01 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Ann M Berger; Kathi Mooney; Amy Alvarez-Perez; William S Breitbart; Kristen M Carpenter; David Cella; Charles Cleeland; Efrat Dotan; Mario A Eisenberger; Carmen P Escalante; Paul B Jacobsen; Catherine Jankowski; Thomas LeBlanc; Jennifer A Ligibel; Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Belinda Mandrell; Barbara A Murphy; Oxana Palesh; William F Pirl; Steven C Plaxe; Michelle B Riba; Hope S Rugo; Carolina Salvador; Lynne I Wagner; Nina D Wagner-Johnston; Finly J Zachariah; Mary Anne Bergman; Courtney Smith Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 11.908