Literature DB >> 12055410

Reference values for ambulatory blood pressure and self-measured blood pressure based on prospective outcome data.

P Verdecchia1.   

Abstract

Although self-measured blood pressure and ambulatory blood pressure are widely used for research and clinical purposes, reference values are still scarcely supported by prospective outcome data. For self-measured blood pressure, values of 135 mmHg systolic and 85 mmHg diastolic (an average of two measurements in the morning and an additional two in the evening for at least 3 working days) have been suggested as the upper-normal reference limits. Unfortunately, these values have received limited support because only one study, the Ohasama study, examined the prognostic value of self-measured home blood pressure. For non-invasive 24 h ambulatory blood pressure, there are at least 11 reports of prospective outcome studies from independent centres that have examined the prognostic values of ambulatory blood pressure, but not all have attempted to define reference values. Currently, an average daytime blood pressure of less that 135 mmHg systolic and less than 85 mmHg diastolic is generally considered to be normal, and a level below 130/80 mmHg may be considered optimal. A reduction in blood pressure of less than 10% from day to night identifies subjects with an increased cardiovascular risk. There is some evidence that cardiovascular risk is further increased when night-time blood pressure is higher than daytime blood pressure. An average 24 h pulse pressure of over 53 mmHg identifies subjects with a raised cardiovascular risk.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12055410     DOI: 10.1097/00126097-200112000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Press Monit        ISSN: 1359-5237            Impact factor:   1.444


  10 in total

1.  The benefit of strength training on arterial blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus measured with ambulatory 24-hour blood pressure systems.

Authors:  Barbara Strasser; Paul Haber; Christoph Strehblow; Edmund Cauza
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2008

2.  Inter-arm blood pressure differences compared with ambulatory monitoring: a manifestation of the 'white-coat' effect?

Authors:  Una Martin; Roger Holder; James Hodgkinson; Richard McManus
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Blood pressure profile is associated with microalbuminuria and retinopathy in hypertensive nondiabetic patients.

Authors:  Berrin Karadag; Tolga Ozyigit; Zeliha Serindag; Aysegul Ilhan; Beste Ozben
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Relative effectiveness of clinic and home blood pressure monitoring compared with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in diagnosis of hypertension: systematic review.

Authors:  J Hodgkinson; J Mant; U Martin; B Guo; F D R Hobbs; J J Deeks; C Heneghan; N Roberts; R J McManus
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-06-24

5.  The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.

Authors:  Linda Beckett; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 2.298

6.  Normative Data for Blood Pressure in Croatian War Veterans: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Mario Kasović; Zvonimir Kalčik; Lovro Štefan; Andro Štefan; Damir Knjaz; Marijana Braš
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Association of Workplace Culture of Health and Employee Emotional Wellbeing.

Authors:  Michele Wolf Marenus; Mary Marzec; Weiyun Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  The natural history of, and risk factors for, progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD): the Renal Impairment in Secondary care (RIISC) study; rationale and protocol.

Authors:  Stephanie Stringer; Praveen Sharma; Mary Dutton; Mark Jesky; Khai Ng; Okdeep Kaur; Iain Chapple; Thomas Dietrich; Charles Ferro; Paul Cockwell
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 9.  What is the evidence base for diagnosing hypertension and for subsequent blood pressure treatment targets in the prevention of cardiovascular disease?

Authors:  Claire L Schwartz; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Comprehensive laboratory reference intervals for routine biochemical markers and pro-oxidant-antioxidant balance (PAB) in male adults.

Authors:  Hamideh Ghazizadeh; Mary Kathryn Bohn; Roshanak Ghaffarian Zirak; Atieh Kamel Khodabandeh; Reza Zare-Feyzabadi; Maryam Saberi-Karimian; Ameneh Timar; Naghmeh Jaberi; Maryam Mohammadi-Bajgiran; Payam Sharifan; Maryam Tayefi; Samaneh Silakhori; Marzieh Emamian; Mohammad Reza Oladi; Habibollah Esmaily; Gordon A Ferns; Khosrow Adeli; Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 2.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.