Literature DB >> 12054821

The structure of apo human glutamate dehydrogenase details subunit communication and allostery.

Thomas J Smith1, Timothy Schmidt, Jie Fang, Jane Wu, Gary Siuzdak, Charles A Stanley.   

Abstract

The structure of human glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) has been determined in the absence of active site and regulatory ligands. Compared to the structures of bovine GDH that were complexed with coenzyme and substrate, the NAD binding domain is rotated away from the glutamate-binding domain. The electron density of this domain is more disordered the further it is from the pivot helix. Mass spectrometry results suggest that this is likely due to the apo form being more dynamic than the closed form. The antenna undergoes significant conformational changes as the catalytic cleft opens. The ascending helix in the antenna moves in a clockwise manner and the helix in the descending strand contracts in a manner akin to the relaxation of an extended spring. A number of spontaneous mutations in this antenna region cause the hyperinsulinism/hyperammonemia syndrome by decreasing GDH sensitivity to the inhibitor, GTP. Since these residues do not directly contact the bound GTP, the conformational changes in the antenna are apparently crucial to GTP inhibition. In the open conformation, the GTP binding site is distorted such that it can no longer bind GTP. In contrast, ADP binding benefits by the opening of the catalytic cleft since R463 on the pivot helix is pushed into contact distance with the beta-phosphate of ADP. These results support the previous proposal that purines regulate GDH activity by altering the dynamics of the NAD binding domain. Finally, a possible structural mechanism for negative cooperativity is presented. (c) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12054821     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00161-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  40 in total

Review 1.  The structure and allosteric regulation of mammalian glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Ming Li; Changhong Li; Aron Allen; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.013

2.  C-terminal hydrophobic interactions play a critical role in oligomeric assembly of the P22 tailspike trimer.

Authors:  Matthew J Gage; Anne Skaja Robinson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 3.  The structure and allosteric regulation of glutamate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Ming Li; Changhong Li; Aron Allen; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Neurochem Int       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 4.  Glutamate dehydrogenase: structure, allosteric regulation, and role in insulin homeostasis.

Authors:  Ming Li; Changhong Li; Aron Allen; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2013-10-12       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Green tea polyphenols control dysregulated glutamate dehydrogenase in transgenic mice by hijacking the ADP activation site.

Authors:  Changhong Li; Ming Li; Pan Chen; Srinivas Narayan; Franz M Matschinsky; Michael J Bennett; Charles A Stanley; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Purification, crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of NADP-dependent glutamate dehydrogenase from Aspergillus niger.

Authors:  Prem Prakash; Adhish S Walvekar; Narayan S Punekar; Prasenjit Bhaumik
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr F Struct Biol Commun       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 1.056

7.  Glutamate dehydrogenase isoforms with N-terminal (His)6- or FLAG-tag retain their kinetic properties and cellular localization.

Authors:  Kamilla Pajęcka; Camilla Wendel Nielsen; Anne Hauge; Ioannis Zaganas; Lasse K Bak; Arne Schousboe; Andreas Plaitakis; Helle S Waagepetersen
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 3.996

8.  Regulation of brain glutamate metabolism by nitric oxide and S-nitrosylation.

Authors:  Karthik Raju; Paschalis-Thomas Doulias; Perry Evans; Elizabeth N Krizman; Joshua G Jackson; Oksana Horyn; Yevgeny Daikhin; Ilana Nissim; Marc Yudkoff; Itzhak Nissim; Kim A Sharp; Michael B Robinson; Harry Ischiropoulos
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 8.192

9.  Computation of conformational coupling in allosteric proteins.

Authors:  Brian A Kidd; David Baker; Wendy E Thomas
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Structure-based predictive models for allosteric hot spots.

Authors:  Omar N A Demerdash; Michael D Daily; Julie C Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.