Literature DB >> 12053717

Recognizing the real threat of biological terror.

Richard P Wenzel1.   

Abstract

Weapons of mass destruction can be used to harm and terrorize populations. Such weapons include those with chemical, nuclear or biological properties. Obviously computer viruses can add additional barriers to a quick response. The most effective, least costly and greatest threats are biologicals. Biological terror is not new, and biological weapons have been used for centuries. However, as a result of modern technology, the risks are greater now and the outcomes more terrible. Today they include live pathogens, various toxins, and theoretically "bioregulators"--biochemicals affecting cell signaling. Altered cell signaling could be used to induce apoptosis-cell death, or a heightened outpouring of cytokines mimicking overwhelming sepsis, or even an intracellular, biochemical "strike" causing cellular paralysis. Biological weaponeers now have the frightening ability to alter the genetic makeup of pathogens, rendering them resistant not only to available antibiotic therapy but also to currently effective vaccines. In dark corners of some fringe groups, bioweaponeers are searching for the capability of designing pathogens that target specific races, by virtue of discriminating ligands (1). The resulting morbidity and mortality from use of any biological weapons will be accompanied by chaos, governmental and social instability, panic, an extraordinary utilization of available resources, and an ongoing epidemic of sleepless nights (2,3). Herein I will review some of the issues and some of the currently available biological weapons. The major goal is to highlight the clinical presentations of patients with infections that could be used as biological weapons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12053717      PMCID: PMC2194471     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc        ISSN: 0065-7778


  23 in total

1.  Australia. Engineered mouse virus spurs bioweapon fears.

Authors:  E Finkel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-01-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  Public-health preparedness for biological terrorism in the USA.

Authors:  A S Khan; S Morse; S Lillibridge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  An epidemic of inhalation anthrax, the first in the twentieth century. I. Clinical features.

Authors:  S A PLOTKIN; P S BRACHMAN; M UTELL; F H BUMFORD; M M ATCHISON
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1960-12       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 4.  Death at Sverdlovsk: what have we learned?

Authors:  D H Walker; O Yampolska; L M Grinberg
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  The Sverdlovsk anthrax outbreak of 1979.

Authors:  M Meselson; J Guillemin; M Hugh-Jones; A Langmuir; I Popova; A Shelokov; O Yampolskaya
Journal:  Science       Date:  1994-11-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Death at Sverdlovsk: a critical diagnosis.

Authors:  N Wade
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-09-26       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Concluding remarks of the Second International Conference on Aerobiology (Airborne Infection).

Authors:  R D Housewright; H N Glassman
Journal:  Bacteriol Rev       Date:  1966-09

Review 8.  Tularemia: a 30-year experience with 88 cases.

Authors:  M E Evans; D W Gregory; W Schaffner; Z A McGee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Pathology of inhalational anthrax in 42 cases from the Sverdlovsk outbreak of 1979.

Authors:  F A Abramova; L M Grinberg; O V Yampolskaya; D H Walker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Human monkeypox.

Authors:  Z Jezek; A I Gromyko; M V Szczeniowski
Journal:  J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1983
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.