OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the intensive care unit neonatologists' attitudes about a neonate with terminal or pre-terminal renal failure. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all French neonatal intensive care units. Physicians were asked to describe their attitude about neonatal chronic renal failure (Would you agree with dialysis and graft for these children?). Physicians were also presented with two clinical observations involving neonates with varying degrees of renal insufficiency and a complicating comorbidity, including neurological abnormality or socioeconomic circumstances. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 92% of the university neonatal care units. The will to take care of a neonate with end-stage renal failure till the renal graft, varied greatly from a centre to another one. Three (9%) university-teams said they had a strong will to bring the baby from the neonatal period to the time of renal graft. Eleven other centres (32%) did not have any will for accompanying the baby till the renal graft. Eight centres (24%) would be rather favourable to the idea of dialysis and graft, and 12 others (35%) would be rather unfavourable. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show great differences between French neonatologists when they are faced to newborns with end stage renal failure. Ethical, medical and organisational difficulties are matters of controversy. The epidemiological impact of the perinatal discussion could be a 20% variation of all the renal grafts in children.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the intensive care unit neonatologists' attitudes about a neonate with terminal or pre-terminal renal failure. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all French neonatal intensive care units. Physicians were asked to describe their attitude about neonatal chronic renal failure (Would you agree with dialysis and graft for these children?). Physicians were also presented with two clinical observations involving neonates with varying degrees of renal insufficiency and a complicating comorbidity, including neurological abnormality or socioeconomic circumstances. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 92% of the university neonatal care units. The will to take care of a neonate with end-stage renal failure till the renal graft, varied greatly from a centre to another one. Three (9%) university-teams said they had a strong will to bring the baby from the neonatal period to the time of renal graft. Eleven other centres (32%) did not have any will for accompanying the baby till the renal graft. Eight centres (24%) would be rather favourable to the idea of dialysis and graft, and 12 others (35%) would be rather unfavourable. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show great differences between French neonatologists when they are faced to newborns with end stage renal failure. Ethical, medical and organisational difficulties are matters of controversy. The epidemiological impact of the perinatal discussion could be a 20% variation of all the renal grafts in children.
Authors: Aleksandra M Zurowska; Michel Fischbach; Alan R Watson; Alberto Edefonti; Constantinos J Stefanidis Journal: Pediatr Nephrol Date: 2012-10-09 Impact factor: 3.714