Literature DB >> 12053329

Percutaneous closure of large atrial septal defects with the Amplatzer Septal Occluder: technical overkill or recommendable alternative treatment?

F Berger1, P Ewert, H Abdul-Khaliq, J H Nürnberg, P E Lange.   

Abstract

To judge whether an Amplatzer Septal Occluder (ASO) can be used as a safe therapy instead of surgery for closure of large atrial septal defects > 25 mm in diameter, we report our experiences in 45 patients out of a cohort of 467 patients after successful ASO implantation within a period of 3 years. Median defect diameter was 28 mm (range 25-36), median age was 41.2 years (range 10.1-77.7 years). Body weight ranged from 33.5 to 112.0 kg (median 68 kg). Due to an inevitable reduction of the stent size with increasing distances of the discs fixed at the thicker part of the atrial septum in larger defects, we implanted devices 2-4 mm larger than the measured stretched diameter. Fluoroscopy times ranged from 2.0 to 24.4 minutes, with a median of 10.3 minutes. Follow-up studies were obtained after 48 hours and 1, 6, and 12 months, and then yearly. The median period of follow-up was 0.82 years (range 0.1-2.6). The complete occlusion rate was 91.1%. A trivial hemodynamically insignificant residual shunt remained in 8.9% of the patients. Three patients showed transient atrial tachyarrhythmias within the first 3 months after implantation and three remained in chronic atrial fibrillation. The excellent results in the short and medium term make Amplatzer device implantation a recommendable safe and effective alternative to surgery, even in selected cases with defects > 25 mm. Final judgement, however, is only possible after long-term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12053329     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2001.tb00714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  5 in total

1.  Mechanical support of the left atrial disc during transcatheter closure of large atrial septal defects in children.

Authors:  Dagmar Hohmann; Stephan Schoof; Armin Wessel; Harald Bertram
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 2.  Challenges encountered during closure of atrial septal defects.

Authors:  W Knirsch; A Dodge-Khatami; E Valsangiacomo-Buechel; M Weiss; F Berger
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Long-term outcomes of device closure of very large secundum atrial septal defects: a comparison of transcatheter vs intraoperative approaches.

Authors:  Jin-Jian Guo; Yu-Kun Luo; Zhao-Yang Chen; Hua Cao; Xiao-Ping Yan; Hua Chen; Ya-Fei Peng; Chao-Gui Lin; Liang-Long Chen
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Catheter-based closure of a large atrial septal defect with inferior rim deficiency using pulmonary vein slide-out assisted implantation technique: a case report.

Authors:  Salvatore Evola; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Giuseppina Novo; Eustaquio Maria Onorato
Journal:  Eur Heart J Case Rep       Date:  2021-02-08

Review 5.  Role of Echocardiography in the Diagnosis and Interventional Management of Atrial Septal Defects.

Authors:  P Syamasundar Rao
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.