Literature DB >> 12053141

Protection and regrowth of the auditory nerve after deafness: neurotrophins, antioxidants and depolarization are effective in vivo.

Josef M Miller1, Amy L Miller, Takahiko Yamagata, Goran Bredberg, Richard A Altschuler.   

Abstract

Deafness, with loss of sensory (hair) cells, results in progressive pathophysiological changes ending in the degeneration of most auditory nerve neurons. It is now possible to consider these events in the broader context of anti-apoptotic survival factors in the peripheral and central nervous system. One consequence of deafferentation of a neuron is the loss of neurotrophins that can lead to a change in oxidative state (formation of free radicals), changes in intracellular Ca(2+), and an up-regulation of apoptotic genes. Interventions that can modify availability of neurotrophins, [Ca(2+)](I), and/or free radical formation or their destructive effects, may preserve the auditory nerve. Some interventions (neurotrophins) may also lead to a regrowth of neurites. Studies in this area are of basic value and also of immediate clinical interest for the application of the cochlear prosthesis to the severe and profoundly deaf, since the benefits of this prosthesis are directly dependent on auditory nerve survival and the proximity of stimulating electrode to neuron. We, and others, have found that auditory nerve degeneration can be prevented by chronic electrical stimulation. We have demonstrated in vivo that this effect can be blocked by tetrodotoxin, thus indicating that propagated action potentials are a necessary condition, and by verapamil (Ca(2+) channel blocker), supporting in vitro studies by others, indicating that L-type Ca(2+) channels are necessary for stimulation-induced rescue of the deafferented auditory nerve. The intensities of electrical stimulation required for rescue are at levels sufficient to express the intermediate-early gene c-fos which can initiate transcription of anti-apoptotic genes and pathways, and up-regulate expression of neurotrophins that may act in an autocrine manner to protect the nerve from death. We, and others, have found that chronic local delivery (osmotic pump and microcannulation of the inner ear fluid spaces) of individual neurotrophins and cocktails of factors can also enhance survival of the deafferented nerve, and some can also initiate a regrowth of degenerated peripheral processes of the nerve into the region of the destroyed sensory epitheliae. Recently, we have shown that this rescue can occur with delayed intervention, after degeneration of some neurons has begun, more closely mimicking the human clinical situation. Finally, we have shown that interventions with antioxidants may also be effective in preventing pathophysiological changes of the auditory nerve following deafness. These studies in the auditory periphery support the 'neurotrophic factor hypothesis' as proposed as a general mechanism underlying neurodegenerative and age-related pathology of the central nervous system. Additional animal studies can yield a rational scientific basis to justify human trials, with a goal to maintain auditory cell survival and initiate and direct fiber growth to the next generation of prosthesis. Intimate contact between electrode and a dense population of auditory neurons should greatly enhance the benefits of these devices for the profoundly deaf. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12053141     DOI: 10.1159/000058306

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  14 in total

1.  Across-site variation in detection thresholds and maximum comfortable loudness levels for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-20

2.  Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Li Xu; Catherine S Thompson
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 1.854

Review 3.  Can neurosphere production help restore inner ear transduction?

Authors:  Maria Sol Collado; Jeffrey R Holt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Increased nuclear permeability is a driver for age-related motoneuron loss.

Authors:  Ashley Gillon; Charlotte Steel; Jon Cornwall; Philip Sheard
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 7.713

5.  Inner ear drug delivery via a reciprocating perfusion system in the guinea pig.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Chen; Sharon G Kujawa; Michael J McKenna; Jason O Fiering; Mark J Mescher; Jeffrey T Borenstein; Erin E Leary Swan; William F Sewell
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-11-07       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing.

Authors:  Bryan E Pfingst; Sara A Bowling; Deborah J Colesa; Soha N Garadat; Yehoash Raphael; Seiji B Shibata; Stefan B Strahl; Gina L Su; Ning Zhou
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Concomitant differentiation of a population of mouse embryonic stem cells into neuron-like cells and schwann cell-like cells in a slow-flow microfluidic device.

Authors:  Poornapriya Ramamurthy; Joshua B White; Joong Yull Park; Richard I Hume; Fumi Ebisu; Flor Mendez; Shuichi Takayama; Kate F Barald
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 3.780

8.  Afferent regulation of oxidative stress in the chick cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  A H Nicholas; R L Hyson
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 9.  Regeneration of the mammalian inner ear sensory epithelium.

Authors:  Dongguang Wei; Ebenezer N Yamoah
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.064

10.  A device for patterned electrical stimulation of cultivated cells: preliminary tests with rat auditory neurons.

Authors:  Patrick Wefstaedt; Gerrit Paasche; John Parker; Thomas Lenarz; Timo Stöver
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.