Literature DB >> 12053014

[3H]muscimol binding to gamma-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors is upregulated in CA1 neurons of the gerbil hippocampus in the ischemia-tolerant state.

Clemens Sommer1, Alexander Fahrner, Marika Kiessling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Excitotoxic activation of glutamate receptors is currently thought to play a pivotal role in delayed neuronal death (DND) of highly vulnerable CA1 neurons in the gerbil hippocampus after transient global ischemia. Postischemic degeneration of these neurons can be prevented by "preconditioning" with a short sublethal ischemic stimulus. The present study was designed to test whether ischemic preconditioning is associated with specific alterations of ligand binding to excitatory glutamate and/or inhibitory gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)A receptors compared with ischemia severe enough to induce DND.
METHODS: With the use of quantitative receptor autoradiography, postischemic ligand binding of [3H]MK-801 and [3H]alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazole propionic acid (AMPA) to excitatory N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and AMPA receptors as well as [3H]muscimol to inhibitory GABA(A) receptors in hippocampal subfields CA1, CA3, and the dentate gyrus were analyzed in 2 experimental paradigms. Gerbils were subjected to (1) a 5-minute ischemic period resulting in DND of CA1 neurons and (2) a 2.5-minute period of ischemia mediating tolerance induction.
RESULTS: [3H]MK-801 and [3H]AMPA binding values to excitatory NMDA and AMPA receptors showed a delayed decrease in relatively ischemia-resistant CA3 and dentate gyrus despite maintained neuronal cell density. [3H]Muscimol binding to GABA(A) receptors in CA1 neurons was transiently but significantly increased after preconditioning but not after global ischemia with consecutive neuronal death.
CONCLUSIONS: Downregulation of ligand binding to glutamate receptors in relatively ischemia-resistant CA3 and dentate gyrus neurons destined to survive suggests marked synaptic reorganization processes despite maintained structural integrity. More importantly, upregulation of binding to inhibitory GABA(A) receptors in the hippocampus indicates a relative shift between inhibitory and excitatory neurotransmission that we suggest may participate in endogenous postischemic neuroprotection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12053014     DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000016404.14407.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  9 in total

Review 1.  Ischemic conditioning-induced endogenous brain protection: Applications pre-, per- or post-stroke.

Authors:  Yuechun Wang; Cesar Reis; Richard Applegate; Gary Stier; Robert Martin; John H Zhang
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 5.330

Review 2.  Mechanisms of neuroprotection during ischemic preconditioning: lessons from anoxic tolerance.

Authors:  Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  A mouse model of cerebral oligemia: relation to brain histopathology, cerebral blood flow, and energy state.

Authors:  Konstanze Plaschke; Clemens Sommer; Helmut Schroeck; Dejana Matejic; Marika Kiessling; Eike Martin; Markus A Weigand; Hubert J Bardenheuer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  GABA synapses mediate neuroprotection after ischemic and epsilonPKC preconditioning in rat hippocampal slice cultures.

Authors:  R Anthony DeFazio; Ami P Raval; Hung W Lin; Kunjan R Dave; David Della-Morte; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Preconditioning-induced ischemic tolerance: a window into endogenous gearing for cerebroprotection.

Authors:  Aysan Durukan; Turgut Tatlisumak
Journal:  Exp Transl Stroke Med       Date:  2010-01-21

6.  Selective overexpression of excitatory amino acid transporter 2 (EAAT2) in astrocytes enhances neuroprotection from moderate but not severe hypoxia-ischemia.

Authors:  M L Weller; I M Stone; A Goss; T Rau; C Rova; D J Poulsen
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 7.  Metabolic downregulation: a key to successful neuroprotection?

Authors:  Midori Yenari; Kazuo Kitagawa; Patrick Lyden; Miguel Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 8.  Cellular and molecular neurobiology of brain preconditioning.

Authors:  Jean Lud Cadet; Irina N Krasnova
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.590

Review 9.  Ischemic preconditioning and clinical scenarios.

Authors:  Srinivasan V Narayanan; Kunjan R Dave; Miguel A Perez-Pinzon
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.710

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.