Literature DB >> 12052632

A multicenter evaluation of linezolid antimicrobial activity in North America.

Charles H Ballow1, Ronald N Jones, Douglas J Biedenbach.   

Abstract

Overall, 141 centers in North America enrolled in this international surveillance study designed to evaluate the in vitro antimicrobial activity and spectrum of linezolid, a new oxazolidinone. Each participant tested the susceptibility of clinical isolates of staphylococcal species (n = 85) against 12 drugs, and enterococcal species (n = 40) against 6 drugs using reference broth microdilution trays; and of streptococcal species (n = 25) against 6 drugs using Etests (AB BIODISK, Solna, Sweden). Quality control testing was conducted using recommended strains, and verification of resistance to linezolid and select other agents was performed by a regional monitor. Of the 20,161 isolates collected from sites across the United States (US; n = 132) and Canada (n = 9), 18,307 were included in this analysis. Oxacillin resistance occurred in 38.7 and 70.6% of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) isolates, respectively. Vancomycin resistance was reported in 65.9 and 2.6% of Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis, respectively. Penicillin resistance occurred in 37.2% of Streptococcus pneumoniae, 17.5% constituting high-level resistance (MIC, > or =2 microg/ml). The MIC(90) for linezolid was 1 microg/ml for streptococci, 2 microg/ml for enterococci and CoNS isolates, and 4 microg/ml for S. aureus. Using the US FDA-recommended susceptible breakpoints for linezolid, there were no confirmed reports of linezolid resistance (i.e., MIC > or =8 microg/ml). The occurrence of linezolid MICs was unimodal and generally varied between, 1-4 microg/ml for staphylococci (94% of recorded results), 1-2 microg/ml for enterococci (93%), and 0.5-1 microg/ml for streptococci (85%). Susceptibility to linezolid was not influenced by susceptibility to other antiicrobials such as vancomycin, beta-lactams or macrolides. Only linezolid was universally active against essentially all tested Gram-positive specimens. The unimodal susceptibility pattern is indicative of excellent and near complete activity against key Gram-positive pathogens including multiply resistant strains, but surveillance for emerging resistances (rare) and the performance of routine susceptibility tests to guide patient therapy seems prudent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052632     DOI: 10.1016/s0732-8893(01)00334-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  11 in total

1.  Quinupristin-dalfopristin resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: novel L22 ribosomal protein mutation in two clinical isolates from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; David J Farrell; Ian Morrissey
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  High rate of resistance to quinupristin-dalfopristin in Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates from Korea.

Authors:  Won Sup Oh; Kwan Soo Ko; Jae-Hoon Song; Mi Young Lee; Sulhee Park; Kyong Ran Peck; Nam Yong Lee; Choon-Kwan Kim; Hyuck Lee; Shin-Woo Kim; Hyun-Ha Chang; Yeon-Sook Kim; Sook-In Jung; Jun Seong Son; Joon-Sup Yeom; Hyun Kyun Ki; Gun-Jo Woo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In vitro activity of an oral streptogramin antimicrobial, XRP2868, against gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  G M Eliopoulos; M J Ferraro; C B Wennersten; R C Moellering
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  In vitro activity of linezolid against key gram-positive organisms isolated in the united states: results of the LEADER 2004 surveillance program.

Authors:  Deborah C Draghi; Daniel J Sheehan; Patricia Hogan; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Activity of linezolid against 3,251 strains of uncommonly isolated gram-positive organisms: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program.

Authors:  Ronald N Jones; Matthew G Stilwell; Patricia A Hogan; Daniel J Sheehan
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Linezolid compared with vancomycin for the prevention of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus or Staphylococcus epidermidis vascular graft infection in rats: A randomized, controlled, experimental study.

Authors:  Suzan Sacar; Mustafa Sacar; Ilknur Kaleli; Semra Toprak; Nural Cevahir; Zafer Teke; Ali Asan; Barbaros Sahin; Ahmet Baltalarli; Huseyin Turgut
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2007-01

7.  Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Authors:  John Weigelt; Kamal Itani; Dennis Stevens; William Lau; Matthew Dryden; Charles Knirsch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis isolated from a cord blood transplant recipient.

Authors:  Imad Dibo; Satish K Pillai; Howard S Gold; Maria R Baer; Meir Wetzler; James L Slack; Peggy A Hazamy; Donna Ball; Chiu Bin Hsiao; Philip L McCarthy; Brahm H Segal
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Linezolid: in infants and children with severe Gram-positive infections.

Authors:  Katherine A Lyseng-Williamson; Karen L Goa
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.022

10.  An assessment of linezolid utilization in selected canadian provinces.

Authors:  Sandra Walker; Linda Dresser; Debbie Becker; Alissa Scalera
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.471

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.