Literature DB >> 12052595

Perianal versus anorectal specimens: is there a difference in Group B streptococcal detection?

Chinyere Orafu1, Prabhcharan Gill, Karl Nelson, Bryan Hecht, Michael Hopkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether specimens obtained from the perianal area have a Group B streptococcal culture detection rate similar to anorectal specimens.
METHODS: This is a prospective cohort study at a tertiary care university-affiliated teaching hospital. A total of 136 pregnant women between 33 and 40 weeks' gestation were recruited. Three samples for Group B streptococcal culture detection were obtained from each subject in the following order: perianal sample, vaginoperianal sample, and an anorectal sample. The women were asked to rank their pain or discomfort with obtaining the anorectal sample. The vaginoperianal specimen is the standard sample obtained from antepartum patients in this clinic, and, therefore, it serves as the control.
RESULTS: Of the 136 subjects, 26.5% of the control, vaginoperianal samples were positive for Group B streptococcal culture. In comparison, 27.2% of the anorectal specimens and 28.7% of the perianal specimens were positive for Group B streptococcal culture. There was no statistically significant difference in the detection of Group B streptococcal culture among the three sample sites. Evaluation of the pain experienced with an anorectal sampling showed that 68% of subjects ranked their pain between mild to moderate, and 5% noted severe pain.
CONCLUSION: The Group B streptococcal detection rate was not different among the three sampling sites. Therefore, pregnant women do not need to be subjected to the additional pain of anorectal sampling to detect Group B Streptococcus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12052595     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01979-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  4 in total

1.  Method for quantitative detection and presumptive identification of group B streptococci on primary plating.

Authors:  Søren Mose Hansen; Uffe B Skov Sørensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Vaccines for maternal immunization against Group B Streptococcus disease: WHO perspectives on case ascertainment and case definitions.

Authors:  Anna C Seale; Carol J Baker; James A Berkley; Shabir A Madhi; Jaume Ordi; Samir K Saha; Stephanie J Schrag; Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen; Johan Vekemans
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hugh C G Nadeau; Courtney Bisson; Xi Chen; Yan D Zhao; Marvin Williams; Rodney K Edwards
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.105

Review 4.  Maternal Colonization With Group B Streptococcus and Serotype Distribution Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.

Authors:  Neal J Russell; Anna C Seale; Megan O'Driscoll; Catherine O'Sullivan; Fiorella Bianchi-Jassir; Juan Gonzalez-Guarin; Joy E Lawn; Carol J Baker; Linda Bartlett; Clare Cutland; Michael G Gravett; Paul T Heath; Kirsty Le Doare; Shabir A Madhi; Craig E Rubens; Stephanie Schrag; Ajoke Sobanjo-Ter Meulen; Johan Vekemans; Samir K Saha; Margaret Ip
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 9.079

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.