BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics, tobacco use patterns over time, and predictors of tobacco cessation among concomitant users of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. METHODS: Participants were employed adults residing in the southeastern United States who participated in the Working Well cancer prevention trial. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed-up 4 years later. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study yielded several key findings: (a) the prevalence of concomitant smoking and smokeless tobacco use was high among males and nonexistent among females, (b) the characteristics of concomitant users were relatively distinct from those of both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, (c) concomitant users exhibited substantial variability in their tobacco use patterns and were less likely to stop using tobacco than were smokers or smokeless tobacco users, (d) indicators of nicotine dependence predicted tobacco cessation for both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, but were largely unrelated to tobacco cessation among concomitant users, and (e) demographics, environmental variables, and measures derived from the transtheoretical model were not consistent predictors of tobacco cessation after controlling for nicotine dependence. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
BACKGROUND: This study examined the characteristics, tobacco use patterns over time, and predictors of tobacco cessation among concomitant users of cigarettes and smokeless tobacco. METHODS:Participants were employed adults residing in the southeastern United States who participated in the Working Well cancer prevention trial. Participants were assessed at baseline and followed-up 4 years later. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The study yielded several key findings: (a) the prevalence of concomitant smoking and smokeless tobacco use was high among males and nonexistent among females, (b) the characteristics of concomitant users were relatively distinct from those of both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, (c) concomitant users exhibited substantial variability in their tobacco use patterns and were less likely to stop using tobacco than were smokers or smokeless tobacco users, (d) indicators of nicotine dependence predicted tobacco cessation for both smokers and smokeless tobacco users, but were largely unrelated to tobacco cessation among concomitant users, and (e) demographics, environmental variables, and measures derived from the transtheoretical model were not consistent predictors of tobacco cessation after controlling for nicotine dependence. Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science (USA).
Authors: Margaret M Walsh; Timothy J Langer; Niall Kavanagh; Chuck Mansell; William MacDougal; Catherine Kavanagh; Stuart A Gansky Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Judith M Graber; Karen Worthington; Kirsten S Almberg; Qingyu Meng; Cecile S Rose; Robert A Cohen Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2016-04 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Brian V Fix; Richard J O'Connor; Lisa Vogl; Danielle Smith; Maansi Bansal-Travers; Kevin P Conway; Bridget Ambrose; Ling Yang; Andrew Hyland Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2013-12-29 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Robert C Klesges; Jon O Ebbert; Glen D Morgan; Deborah Sherrill-Mittleman; Taghrid Asfar; Wayne G Talcott; Margaret Debon Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-03-24 Impact factor: 4.244