Literature DB >> 12051441

Responses to cochlear normalized speech stimuli in the auditory nerve of cat.

Alberto Recio1, William S Rhode, Michael Kiefte, Keith R Kluender.   

Abstract

Previous studies of auditory-nerve fiber (ANF) representation of vowels in cats and rodents (chinchillas and guinea pigs) have shown that, at amplitudes typical for conversational speech (60-70 dB), neuronal firing rate as a function of characteristic frequency alone provides a poor representation of spectral prominences (e.g., formants) of speech sounds. However, ANF rate representations may not be as inadequate as they appear. Here, it is investigated whether some of this apparent inadequacy owes to the mismatch between animal and human cochlear characteristics. For all animal models tested in earlier studies, the basilar membrane is shorter and encompasses a broader range of frequencies than that of humans. In this study, a customized speech synthesizer was used to create a rendition of the vowel [E] with formant spacing and bandwidths that fit the cat cochlea in proportion to the human cochlea. In these vowels, the spectral envelope is matched to cochlear distance rather than to frequency. Recordings of responses to this cochlear normalized [E] in auditory-nerve fibers of cats demonstrate that rate-based encoding of vowel sounds is capable of distinguishing spectral prominences even at 70-80-dB SPL. When cochlear dimensions are taken into account, rate encoding in ANF appears more informative than was previously believed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12051441     DOI: 10.1121/1.1468878

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  Phase effects on the perceived elevation of complex tones.

Authors:  William M Hartmann; Virginia Best; Johahn Leung; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Temporal-envelope reconstruction for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Christian Lorenzi; Nicolas Wallaert; Dan Gnansia; Agnès Claire Leger; David Timothy Ives; André Chays; Stéphane Garnier; Yves Cazals
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-25

5.  Reverberation impairs brainstem temporal representations of voiced vowel sounds: challenging "periodicity-tagged" segregation of competing speech in rooms.

Authors:  Mark Sayles; Arkadiusz Stasiak; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-12

6.  High-resolution frequency tuning but not temporal coding in the human cochlea.

Authors:  Eric Verschooten; Christian Desloovere; Philip X Joris
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.