Literature DB >> 12050200

Genetic control of susceptibility to osteoporosis.

Stuart H Ralston1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a common disease with a strong genetic component. Twin studies have shown that genetic factors play an important role in regulating bone mineral density (BMD), ultrasound properties of bone, skeletal geometry, and bone turnover as well as contributing to the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fracture itself. These phenotypes are determined by the combined effects of several genes and environmental influences, but occasionally, osteoporosis or unusually high bone mass can occur as the result of mutations in a single gene. Examples are the osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome, caused by inactivating mutations in the lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 gene and the high bone mass syndrome, caused by activating mutations of the same gene. Genome-wide linkage studies in man have identified loci on chromosomes 1p36, 1q21, 2p21, 5q33-35, 6p11-12, and 11q12-13 that show definite or probable linkage to BMD, but so far, the causative genes remain to be identified. Linkage studies in mice have similarly identified several loci that regulate BMD, and a future challenge will be to investigate the syntenic loci in humans. A great deal of research has been done on candidate genes; among the best studied are the vitamin D receptor and the collagen type I alpha 1 gene. Polymorphisms of vitamin D receptor have been associated with bone mass in several studies, and there is evidence to suggest that this association may be modified by dietary calcium and vitamin D intake. A functional polymorphism affecting an Sp1 binding site has been identified in the collagen type I alpha 1 gene that predicts osteoporotic fractures independently of bone mass by influencing collagen gene regulation and bone quality. An important problem with most candidate gene studies is small sample size, and this has led to conflicting results in different populations. Some researchers are exploring the use of meta-analysis to try and address this issue and gain an accurate estimate of effect size for different polymorphisms in relation to relevant clinical endpoints, such as BMD and fracture. From a clinical standpoint, advances in knowledge about the genetic basis of osteoporosis are important, because they offer the prospect of developing genetic markers for the assessment of fracture risk and the opportunity to identify molecules that will be used as targets for the design of new drugs for the prevention and treatment of bone disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12050200     DOI: 10.1210/jcem.87.6.8621

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab        ISSN: 0021-972X            Impact factor:   5.958


  71 in total

1.  Genome-wide association of an integrated osteoporosis-related phenotype: is there evidence for pleiotropic genes?

Authors:  David Karasik; Ching Lung Cheung; Yanhua Zhou; L Adrienne Cupples; Douglas P Kiel; Serkalem Demissie
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Animal models for discovery and assessment of genetic determinants of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Robert J Shmookler Reis; Robert H Ebert
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Genetic variation in TRPS1 may regulate hip geometry as well as bone mineral density.

Authors:  Cheryl L Ackert-Bicknell; Serkalem Demissie; Shirng-Wern Tsaih; Wesley G Beamer; L Adrienne Cupples; Beverly J Paigen; Yi-Hsiang Hsu; Douglas P Kiel; David Karasik
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  A haplotype of MATN3 is associated with vertebral fracture in Chinese postmenopausal women: Peking Vertebral Fracture (PK-VF) study.

Authors:  Jing Zhao; Weibo Xia; Min Nie; Xin Zheng; Qiuping Wang; Xiran Wang; Wenbo Wang; Zhiwei Ning; Wei Huang; Yan Jiang; Mei Li; Ou Wang; Xiaoping Xing; Yue Sun; Lianmei Luo; Shuli He; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Yu Pei; Fan Zhang; Youxia Han; Yanmin Tong; Ying Che; Ruixin Shen; Yingying Hu; Xueying Zhou; Qian Chen; Ling Xu
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Genetics of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Huilin Jin; Stuart H Ralston
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.592

6.  Genetic and environmental correlations between bone phenotypes and anthropometric indices in Chinese.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Yang; Volodymyr Dvornyk; Wei-Xia Jian; Su-Mei Xiao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  The role of estrogen receptor-alpha gene TA polymorphism and aromatase gene TTTA polymorphism on peak bone mass attainment in males: is there an additive negative effect of certain allele combinations?

Authors:  Darko Kastelan; Zorana Grubic; Ivana Kraljevic; Ozren Polasek; Tina Dusek; Katarina Stingl; Vesna Kerhin-Brkljacic; Mirko Korsic
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  Polymorphisms in the endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene and bone density/ultrasound and geometry in humans.

Authors:  K Cho; S Demissie; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; S Kathiresan; T J Beck; D Karasik; D P Kiel
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Sister's fracture history may be associated with perimenopausal bone fragility and modifies the predictability of fracture risk.

Authors:  J Sirola; K Salovaara; M Tuppurainen; J S Jurvelin; E Alhava; H Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  Prolidase activity and oxidative status in patients with thalassemia major.

Authors:  Alpay Cakmak; Murat Soker; Ahmet Koc; Nurten Aksoy
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.