Literature DB >> 12049952

Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.

Ming-Feng Hou1, Hung-Yi Chuang, Fu Ou-Yang, Chen-Ya Wang, Chyi-Lie Huang, Hui-Mei Fan, Chieh-Han Chuang, Jaw-Yuan Wang, Jan-Singh Hsieh, Gin-Chung Liu, Tsung-Jen Huang.   

Abstract

Recommended surveillance for screening breast cancer, which includes regular mammography and clinical breast examination, has long been established in Western countries. This strategy may be too costly and unnecessary for countries with low incidences of breast cancer. The purpose of the present study is to compare breast mammography, sonography and physical examination in screening female relatives of breast cancer index cases from the hospital, and their relative efficiency. A total of 935 women over 35 years old, who were relatives of breast cancer patients, were invited to an annual screening by means of a combination of mammography, sonography and physical examination on a single day. A biopsy was performed when any of the three investigations indicated a possibility of malignancy. A total of 21 breast cancers, including sixteen invasive cancers and 5 noninvasive cancers, were detected among the 935 high-risk women. Of the cancers, 18, including 16 invasive cancers and 3 noninvasive cancers, were detected by sonography. In contrast, only 11 invasive cancers were detected by mammography, and 7 by physical examination. There were only 14 cancers detected by a combination of mammography and physical examination. The 7 (33.3%) additional cancers were detected when sonography was added. The sensitivity of sonography was 90.4%, which was higher than mammography (52.4%) and physical examination (33.3%), or even a combination of these two modalities (66.7%). This indicates that sonography is a more accurate screening tool for breast cancer in the high-risk group. Although breast sonography has not yet been recommended as a routine screening tool for breast cancer in Western countries, it may be superior to mammography and physical examination for the screening of Taiwanese high-risk female relatives of breast cancer index cases. If it should also be considered as a routine adjunct screening modality for Taiwanese women with lower rates of breast cancer will need further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049952     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(02)00483-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  12 in total

1.  Imaging studies for the early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sylvia H Heywang-Köbrunner; Ingrid Schreer; Walter Heindel; Alexander Katalinic
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-04       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 2.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Can concurrent core biopsy and fine needle aspiration biopsy improve the false negative rate of sonographically detectable breast lesions?

Authors:  Yao-Lung Kuo; Tsai-Wang Chang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Breast Medical Tactile Examiners (MTEs): A Prospective Pilot Study.

Authors:  Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Mayada R Bani; Marius Wunderle; Charlotte Sell; Caroline Preuss; Claudia Rauh; Sebastian M Jud; Felix Heindl; Hanna Langemann; Thomas Geyer; Anna-Lisa Brandl; Carolin C Hack; Werner Adler; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Matthias W Beckmann; Peter A Fasching; Paul Gass
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Major Functional Transcriptome of an Inferred Center Regulator of an ER(-) Breast Cancer Model System.

Authors:  Li-Yu Daisy Liu; Li-Yun Chang; Wen-Hung Kuo; Hsiao-Lin Hwa; Yi-Shing Lin; Shiu-Feng Huang; Chiung-Nien Chen; King-Jen Chang; Fon-Jou Hsieh
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2012-04-19

6.  Evaluation of clinical breast examination and breast ultrasonography among pregnant women in Abakaliki, Nigeria.

Authors:  Paul Olisaemeka Ezeonu; Leonard Ogbonna Ajah; Robinson Chukwudi Onoh; Lucky Osaheni Lawani; Vincent Chidi Enemuo; Uzoma MaryRose Agwu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Examining the Associations among Fibrocystic Breast Change, Total Lean Mass, and Percent Body Fat.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuei Chen; Wen-Hui Fang; Chung-Ching Wang; Tung-Wei Kao; Yaw-Wen Chang; Hui-Fang Yang; Chen-Jung Wu; Yu-Shan Sun; Wei-Liang Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review.

Authors:  Monika Nothacker; Volker Duda; Markus Hahn; Mathias Warm; Friedrich Degenhardt; Helmut Madjar; Susanne Weinbrenner; Ute-Susann Albert
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-20       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  New technologies in screening for breast cancer: a systematic review of their accuracy.

Authors:  L Irwig; N Houssami; C van Vliet
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Errors in Mammography Cannot be Solved Through Technology Alone

Authors:  Ernest Usang Ekpo; Maram Alakhras; Patrick Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.