BACKGROUND: While there is agreement that verapamil attenuates the AF- induced refractory period shortening when given before AF induction, controversy exists regarding its effects when given after the onset of persistent AF. This study aimed to compare atrial fibrillatory frequency obtained from the surface ECG in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with oral verapamil treatment to those without this treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Surface ECG recordings were performed in 57 patients (34 male, 23 female, mean age 59 +/- 11 years) with persistent AF (> 7 days). The frequency content of the fibrillatory baseline was quantified using digital signal processing (filtering, QRST complex averaging and subtraction, Fourier transformation). In 27 patients with verapamil treatment (120 or 240 mg/day for at least 7 days) mean fibrillatory frequency measured 6.4 +/- 0.2 Hz, compared to 7.0 +/- 0.4 Hz (P = 0.012) in 30 patients without verapamil. In a subset of 20 randomly selected patients (10 with, 10 without verapamil treatment) a 24-hour Holter ECG recording was performed and fibrillatory frequency determined at 4 PM, 10 PM, 4 AM, and 10 AM. While there was a significant frequency reduction in the verapamil treated patients at night (P = 0.011), it remained constant over time in the other patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent AF, fibrillatory frequency assessed by spectral analysis of the surface ECG is lower in patients taking verapamil.
BACKGROUND: While there is agreement that verapamil attenuates the AF- induced refractory period shortening when given before AF induction, controversy exists regarding its effects when given after the onset of persistent AF. This study aimed to compare atrial fibrillatory frequency obtained from the surface ECG in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with oral verapamil treatment to those without this treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: Surface ECG recordings were performed in 57 patients (34 male, 23 female, mean age 59 +/- 11 years) with persistent AF (> 7 days). The frequency content of the fibrillatory baseline was quantified using digital signal processing (filtering, QRST complex averaging and subtraction, Fourier transformation). In 27 patients with verapamil treatment (120 or 240 mg/day for at least 7 days) mean fibrillatory frequency measured 6.4 +/- 0.2 Hz, compared to 7.0 +/- 0.4 Hz (P = 0.012) in 30 patients without verapamil. In a subset of 20 randomly selected patients (10 with, 10 without verapamil treatment) a 24-hour Holter ECG recording was performed and fibrillatory frequency determined at 4 PM, 10 PM, 4 AM, and 10 AM. While there was a significant frequency reduction in the verapamil treated patients at night (P = 0.011), it remained constant over time in the other patients. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistent AF, fibrillatory frequency assessed by spectral analysis of the surface ECG is lower in patients taking verapamil.
Authors: E G Daoud; B P Knight; R Weiss; M Bahu; W Paladino; R Goyal; K C Man; S A Strickberger; F Morady Journal: Circulation Date: 1997-09-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: H Ramanna; A Elvan; F H Wittkampf; J M de Bakker; R N Hauer; E O Robles de Medina Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2001-04 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: H S Friedman; E Rodney; B Sinha; A Sharafkhaneh; N Wattanasuwan; M Win; D Mallipeddi; A Sinha; A Hussain; C P Dai Journal: J Investig Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: C J Meurling; J E Waktare; F Holmqvist; A Hedman; A J Camm; S B Olsson; M Malik Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: M Holm; S Pehrson; M Ingemansson; L Sörnmo; R Johansson; L Sandhall; M Sunemark; B Smideberg; C Olsson; S B Olsson Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 1998-04 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: David Filgueiras-Rama; Sergio Castrejón; Conrado Calvo; Alejandro Estrada; David Doiny; Marta Ortega; Omer Berenfeld; José L Merino; José Jalife Journal: Arch Cardiol Mex Date: 2012 Apr-Jun
Authors: Sandeep V Pandit; Omer Berenfeld; Justus M B Anumonwo; Roman M Zaritski; James Kneller; Stanley Nattel; José Jalife Journal: Biophys J Date: 2005-03-25 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: María S Guillem; Andreu M Climent; Miguel Rodrigo; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Felipe Atienza; Omer Berenfeld Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2016-01-19 Impact factor: 10.787