Literature DB >> 12049244

Magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of magnitude.

Jessica M Choplin1, John E Hummel.   

Abstract

Many cognitive processes rely on representations of magnitude, yet these representations are often malleable (H. Helson, 1964; J. Huttenlocher, L. V. Hedges, & J. L. Vevea, 2000; A. Parducci, 1965). It is likely that factors that affect these representations in turn affect the psychological processes that rely on them. The authors conducted 4 experiments to investigate whether language-expressible magnitude comparisons distort mental representations of compared magnitudes. Participants compared magnitudes and estimated those magnitudes in a variety of tasks. Experiments 1 through 3 demonstrated systematic comparison-induced distortions. Experiment 4 demonstrated that comparison-induced distortions might account for the asymmetric dominance effect discussed in the decision-making literature. Potential effects of comparison-induced distortions on other psychological processes (e.g., density effects, order effects, body-size estimation, pain estimation, and consumer decision making) are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12049244     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.131.2.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  9 in total

1.  Category effects on stimulus estimation: shifting and skewed frequency distributions.

Authors:  Sean Duffy; Janellen Huttenlocher; Larry V Hedges; L Elizabeth Crawford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

2.  Comparison-induced decoy effects.

Authors:  Jessica M Choplin; John E Hummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-03

3.  Beyond common features: the role of roles in determining similarity.

Authors:  Matt Jones; Bradley C Love
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2006-11-13       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Reply to Duffy and Smith's (2018) reexamination.

Authors:  L Elizabeth Crawford
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-04

5.  Category effects on stimulus estimation: Shifting and skewed frequency distributions-A reexamination.

Authors:  Sean Duffy; John Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

6.  The change-of-standard effect: distorted standards and adjusted impressions.

Authors:  Thomas L Spalding; Allison C Mullaly; Victoria L Phillips
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

7.  Semantic congruity affects numerical judgments similarly in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Jessica F Cantlon; Elizabeth M Brannon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Context dependency in risky decision making: Is there a description-experience gap?

Authors:  Inkyung Park; Paul D Windschitl; Andrew R Smith; Shanon Rule; Aaron M Scherer; Jillian O Stuart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The culture of social comparison.

Authors:  Matthew Baldwin; Thomas Mussweiler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 11.205

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.