Literature DB >> 12049115

Blood culture quality improvement: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study involving 909 institutions and 289 572 blood culture sets.

R B Schifman1, P Bachner, P J Howanitz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate solitary blood culture (SBC) collections as a preanalytic quality indicator of blood culture practice. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes laboratory quality improvement studies involving prospective evaluation of the proportion of and reasons for SBC collections in 909 institutions. OUTCOME: Reduction in the proportion of SBCs.
RESULTS: Of 289572 blood culture sets studied, the median proportion of SBCs per institution was 10.1% and 12.1% among adult inpatients, 25.4% and 33.3% among adult outpatients, and 89.0% and 100% among pediatric/infant patients in the first and second (follow-up) studies, respectively. The two most common reasons for not performing a second culture in adults were (1) test not indicated and (2) physician believed one was sufficient. When compared with inpatient cultures, a significantly higher proportion of outpatient SBCs were classified as not indicated (P < .0001). Among 198 institutions participating in both studies, a significant decline in SBC rates was observed in the subgroup (n = 50) that continued to monitor SBCs (P = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Interinstitutional evaluation of solitary blood cultures provides a benchmark for quality assessment and an opportunity for performance improvement in blood culture specimen collections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 12049115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  7 in total

Review 1.  Updated review of blood culture contamination.

Authors:  Keri K Hall; Jason A Lyman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Identification of the main contributors to blood culture contamination at a tertiary care academic medical center.

Authors:  Brianna Sacchetti; Justin Travis; Lisa L Steed; Ginny Webb
Journal:  Infect Prev Pract       Date:  2022-05-24

3.  Superior sensitivity and decreased time to detection with the Bactec Peds Plus/F system compared to the BacT/Alert Pediatric FAN blood culture system.

Authors:  K V Sullivan; N N Turner; D P Lancaster; A R Shah; L J Chandler; D F Friedman; D L Blecker-Shelly
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  How to Optimize the Use of Blood Cultures for the Diagnosis of Bloodstream Infections? A State-of-the Art.

Authors:  Brigitte Lamy; Sylvie Dargère; Maiken C Arendrup; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Pierre Tattevin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in predicting bacteraemia in elderly patients admitted to the emergency department: prospective study in Japan.

Authors:  Yoshiro Imai; Kohei Taniguchi; Ryo Iida; Masahiko Nitta; Kazuhisa Uchiyma; Akira Takasu
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Effects of COVID-19 on Blood Culture Contamination at a Tertiary Care Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Brianna Sacchetti; Justin Travis; Lisa L Steed; Ginny Webb
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-03-30

7.  Bloodstream infections, antibiotic resistance and the practice of blood culture sampling in Germany: study design of a Thuringia-wide prospective population-based study (AlertsNet).

Authors:  André Karch; Roland P Schmitz; Florian Rißner; Stefanie Castell; Sandra Töpel; Matthias Jakob; Frank M Brunkhorst; Rafael T Mikolajczyk
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.