Literature DB >> 12048178

Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing.

Sebastien Barthélémy1, Philippe Boulinguez.   

Abstract

Right-handers exhibit a left hand advantage in response preparation when pointing to targets. These manual asymmetries are generally attributed to a right hemisphere specialization for spatial processing. More precisely, the left hand reaction time (RT) advantage was recently supposed to reflect specifically the right hemisphere superiority for movement planning. This study proposes to investigate a possible attentional origin for manual RT asymmetries. In a first experiment, we used the covert orienting of attention paradigm to measure subjects' RTs when reaching at targets (pointing task) both in valid, neutral and invalid conditions, either in the left or in the right visual fields and with the left and the right hand. In a second experiment, we applied the same paradigm to a detection task (key-pressing). Results revealed that orienting of attention to spatial locations was more time consuming when responding with the right than with the left hand, whether movement planning was required or not. It is suggested that the right hemisphere dominance for orienting of visuospatial attention account, partly at least, for the RT asymmetries classically observed in manual aiming.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12048178     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00446-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Inhibitory control of reaching movements in humans.

Authors:  Giovanni Mirabella; Pierpaolo Pani; Martin Paré; Stefano Ferraina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The cost of moving with the left hand.

Authors:  Jonathan Vaughan; Deborah A Barany; Tristan Rios
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Acute dose of alcohol affects cognitive components of reaction time to an omitted stimulus: differences among sensory systems.

Authors:  Oscar H Hernández; Muriel Vogel-Sprott; Teresita C Huchín-Ramirez; Fernando Aké-Estrada
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Do left hand reaction time advantages depend on localising unpredictable targets?

Authors:  Leah T Johnstone; David P Carey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Are there right hemisphere contributions to visually-guided movement? Manipulating left hand reaction time advantages in dextrals.

Authors:  David P Carey; E Grace Otto-de Haart; Gavin Buckingham; H Chris Dijkerman; Eric L Hargreaves; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-28

6.  An event-related potential investigation of spatial attention orientation in children trained with mental abacus calculation.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Liu; Yanchao Sun
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Aging of stimulus-driven and goal-directed attentional processes in young immigrants with long-term high altitude exposure in Tibet: An ERP study.

Authors:  Hailin Ma; Xiaoyan Huang; Ming Liu; Huifang Ma; Delong Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Two separate, large cohorts reveal potential modifiers of age-associated variation in visual reaction time performance.

Authors:  J S Talboom; M D De Both; M A Naymik; A M Schmidt; C R Lewis; W M Jepsen; A K Håberg; T Rundek; B E Levin; S Hoscheidt; Y Bolla; R D Brinton; N J Schork; M Hay; C A Barnes; E Glisky; L Ryan; M J Huentelman
Journal:  NPJ Aging Mech Dis       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Kinematic and neurophysiological consequences of an assisted-force-feedback brain-machine interface training: a case study.

Authors:  Stefano Silvoni; Marianna Cavinato; Chiara Volpato; Giulia Cisotto; Clara Genna; Michela Agostini; Andrea Turolla; Ander Ramos-Murguialday; Francesco Piccione
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Relative performance of the two hands in simple and choice reaction time tasks.

Authors:  M Nisiyama; L E Ribeiro-do-Valle
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.590

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.