Literature DB >> 12047079

Behaviour of laying hens in two types of aviary systems on 25 commercial farms in Sweden.

K Odén1, L J Keeling, B Algers.   

Abstract

1. Fifty-one flocks of laying hens in two high-density loose-housing systems were studied on 25 commercial farms in Sweden as part of a government test programme for evaluating new systems for laying hens. Six different hybrids were used in group sizes ranging from 250 to 5 000 birds. Stocking-densities varied from 10.2 to 19.1 birds per m2 floor area. No birds were beak trimmed. 2. The distribution of birds in the system, the frequency and location of aggressive pecks and feather pecks, the dust bathing activity and the birds' fear reaction to the keeper and to a novel object were measured. Direct behaviour observations were carried out twice per flock, at weeks 35 and 55. 3. The proportion of birds at the different locations was relatively constant across the 8-h observation period in the tiered system, but changed over time in the perch system, which may reflect a difference in access to resources between the systems. At night the top perches/tiers were preferred although when stocking-density increased, other sites were also used. 4. Aggression occurred mainly on the litter or in the nest areas. It did not differ between hybrids, but increased with age in the tiered system. Feather pecks occurred mainly on the litter. Brown hybrids feather pecked more than white ones, while white hybrids reacted more both to the keeper and to a novel object than did the brown hybrids. 5. It was concluded that access to nests was insufficient in both systems, as was litter space. Feed space was insufficient in the tiered system if food requirements increased. Design of the top perches, in the perch system, should be improved to allow birds to perch high up in the system without blocking access to feed etc. for others.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12047079     DOI: 10.1080/00071660120121364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  15 in total

1.  Influence of genetic strain and access to litter on spatial distribution of 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Space use by 4 strains of laying hens to perch, wing flap, dust bathe, stand and lie down.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Riddle; Ahmed B A Ali; Dana L M Campbell; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Housing and Management Practices on 33 Pullet Farms in Canada.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Caitlin Decina; Christine F Baes; Tina M Widowski; Olaf Berke; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Characterising Free-Range Layer Flocks Using Unsupervised Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  Terence Zimazile Sibanda; Mitchell Welch; Derek Schneider; Manisha Kolakshyapati; Isabelle Ruhnke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Perch use by laying hens in a commercial aviary.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; M M Makagon; J C Swanson; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Nest use and patterns of egg laying and damage by 4 strains of laying hens in an aviary system.

Authors:  S Villanueva; A B A Ali; D L M Campbell; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Laying hens in aviaries with different litter substrates: Behavior across the flock cycle and feather lipid content.

Authors:  D L M Campbell; A B A Ali; D M Karcher; J M Siegford
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Using Radio-Frequency Identification Technology to Measure Synchronised Ranging of Free-Range Laying Hens.

Authors:  Dana L M Campbell; Brian J Horton; Geoff N Hinch
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 2.752

9.  Environmental complexity: A buffer against stress in the domestic chick.

Authors:  Irene Campderrich; Franco Nicolas Nazar; Anette Wichman; Raul Hector Marin; Inma Estevez; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Feather Pecking and Cannibalism in Non-Beak-Trimmed Laying Hen Flocks-Farmers' Perspectives.

Authors:  Eija Kaukonen; Anna Valros
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.