Literature DB >> 12045771

The effect of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of different orthodontic adhesives.

Samir E Bishara1, John F Laffoon, Leigh Vonwald, John J Warren.   

Abstract

One problem clinicians face during treatment is bracket failure. In a busy orthodontic practice, a significant number of teeth will need to be rebonded. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of repeated bonding with 2 different adhesives, a composite and a cyanoacrylate, on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Thirty-one freshly extracted human molars were collected. Brackets were bonded with 1 of the orthodontic adhesives according to the manufacturer's instructions. In group I, the teeth were etched with 37% phosphoric acid, a sealant was applied, and the brackets were bonded with Transbond XT (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) and light cured for 20 seconds. In group II, the teeth were etched with 35% phosphoric acid, and the brackets were bonded with SmartBond (Gestenco International, Göthenburg, Sweden). In each group, the teeth were bonded and debonded 3 times with the same adhesive. At each sequence, the brackets were removed within 30 minutes after bonding to simulate the clinical condition at which a newly bonded bracket is tied to the archwire. Student t tests and the analysis of variance repeated measure were used to compare the shear bond strength between adhesives and within each adhesive at different debonding sequences. The results indicated that, at the first debonding sequence, the 2 adhesives did not have significantly different shear bond strengths. Between debonding sequence 1 and 2, there was a significant (P <or=.05) decrease in the shear bond strength of both adhesives. SmartBond decreased from x = 5.7 +/- 3.8 MPa to x = 2.2 +/- 2.6 MPa, and Transbond decreased from x = 6.1 +/- 3.4 to x = 4.1 +/- 2.3 MPa. When the 2 adhesives were compared at the second debonding sequence, the shear bond strength of Transbond was significantly greater than that of SmartBond (P =.046). Between debonding sequences 2 and 3, there were no significant differences either between the adhesives or in the change within each adhesive. The highest values for shear bond strength were obtained after the initial bonding. Rebonded teeth had significantly lower shear bond strength. The composite adhesive had a higher shear bond strength than the cyanoacrylate adhesive at the second bonding/debonding sequence but not at the third. The changes in bond strength after repeated bonding may be related to changes in the morphologic characteristics of the tooth surface caused by adhesive remnants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12045771     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.123042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  12 in total

1.  SBS vs Inhouse Recycling Methods-An Invitro Evaluation.

Authors:  Supradeep Kumar Kamisetty; Jaya Krishanan Verma; Shanta Sundari; Shyamala Chandrasekhar; Aravind Kumar
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-09-01

2.  Release of fluoride from orthodontic adhesives and penetration into enamel.

Authors:  Panita Suebsureekul; Smorntree Viteporn
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Comparison of Microleakage under Rebonded Stainless Steel Orthodontic Brackets Using Two Methods of Adhesive Removal: Sandblast and Laser.

Authors:  Mohamad Hossein Tudehzaeim; Soghra Yassaei; Shohreh Taherimoghadam
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-02

4.  Effect of multiple debonding sequences on shear bond strength of new stainless steel brackets.

Authors:  Ladan Eslamian; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani; Pegah Tavakol; Ali Tavakol; Nazila Amini; Edward Lynch
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

5.  Effects of recycling and bonding agent application on bond strength of stainless steel orthodontic brackets.

Authors:  Faisal I Bahnasi; Aida Na Abd-Rahman; Mohame I Abu-Hassan
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2013-10-01

6.  Recycling stainless steel orthodontic brackets with Er:YAG laser - An environmental scanning electron microscope and shear bond strength study.

Authors:  Prince K Chacko; Jithesh Kodoth; Jacob John; Kishore Kumar
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2013-07

7.  Effect of Removal of Enamel on Rebonding Strength of Resin Composite to Enamel.

Authors:  L Kilponen; L Lassila; M Tolvanen; J Varrela; P K Vallittu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Evaluation of the effect of three innovative recyling methods on the shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets-an in vitro study.

Authors:  Neeraj Gupta; Dilip Kumar; Aparna Palla
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-04-01

9.  In vivo effects of two acidic soft drinks on shear bond strength of metal orthodontic brackets with and without resin infiltration treatment.

Authors:  Shaza M Hammad; Enas T Enan
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Physical and chemical mechanisms involved in adhesion of orthodontic bonding composites: in vitro evaluations.

Authors:  R Condò; G Mampieri; A Cioffi; M E Cataldi; I Frustaci; A Giancotti; V Campanella; V Mussi; A Convertino; L Maiolo; G Pasquantonio
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.