Literature DB >> 12045763

Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion.

Marcio Rodrigues De Almeida1, José Fernando Castanha Henriques, Weber Ursi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to compare the dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric changes produced by the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in persons with Class II malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms were available for 66 patients of both sexes, who were divided into 3 groups of 22. The control group included untreated Class II children, with an initial mean age of 8 years 7 months; they were followed without treatment for 13 months. The FR-2 appliance group had an initial mean age of 9 years; those children were treated for a mean period of 17 months. The bionator group initially had a mean age of 10 years 8 months; on average, they were treated for 16 months. The results demonstrated no significant changes in maxillary growth during the evaluation period. Both appliances showed statistically significant increases in mandibular growth and mandibular protrusion, with greater increases in patients treated in the bionator group. Both experimental groups showed an improvement in the maxillomandibular relationship. There were no significant changes in growth direction, while the bionator group had a greater increase in posterior facial height. Both appliances produced similar labial tipping and protrusion of the lower incisors, lingual inclination, retrusion of the upper incisors, and a significant increase in mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height. The major treatment effects of bionator and FR-2 appliances were dentoalveolar, with a smaller, but significant, skeletal effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12045763     DOI: 10.1067/mod.2002.123037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  10 in total

1.  Therapeutic approach to Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with maxillary functional orthopedics.

Authors:  Aristeu Corrêa de Bittencourt Neto; Armando Yukio Saga; Ariel Adriano Reyes Pacheco; Orlando Tanaka
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 Jul-Aug

2.  Short-term dentoskeletal changes following Class II treatment using a fixed functional appliance: the Austro Repositioner : A pilot study.

Authors:  M Dolores Austro; Encarnación González; M Angustias Peñalver; Domingo Pérez; José Antonio Alarcón
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: a prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment.

Authors:  Fernanda Angelieri; Lorenzo Franchi; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Marco A Scanavini; James A McNamara
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Study of mandibular growth in patients treated with Fränkel's functional regulator (1b).

Authors:  Juan-Jose Alió-Sanz; Eyleen Kato; Jose Lorenzo-Pernía; Carmen Iglesias-Conde; Alejandro Iglesias-Linares; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 5.  Orthodontic treatment for prominent upper front teeth (Class II malocclusion) in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Klaus Bsl Batista; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jayne E Harrison; Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-03-13

6.  Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.

Authors:  Leniana Santos Neves; Guilherme Janson; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de Lima; Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.750

7.  A Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block and Bionator Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadian-Babaki; S Mehdi Araghbidi-Kashani; Saeedeh Mokhtari
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

8.  Dentoskeletal modifications in Class II deep bite malocclusion treatment with anterior bite plane functional appliance.

Authors:  Domenico Ciavarella; Michele Laurenziello; Laura Guida; Graziano Montaruli; Crescenzio Gallo; Michele Tepedino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-08-01

9.  A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.

Authors:  Esra Yüksel Coşkun; Elçin Esenlik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-26

10.  Comparative Evaluation of Esthetic and Structural Aspects in Class II Functional Therapy. A Case-Control Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Gabriella Galluccio; Rosanna Guarnieri; Diana Jamshir; Alessandra Impellizzeri; Gaetano Ierardo; Ersilia Barbato
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.