Literature DB >> 12045549

Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation significantly reduces superficial wound complications in "separation of parts" hernia repairs.

Alexandrina S Saulis1, Gregory A Dumanian.   

Abstract

Midline ventral hernia repair with bilateral sliding myofascial rectus abdominis flaps, or the "separation of parts" technique, has low hernia recurrence rates. However, this technique, as originally described, creates massively undermined skin and subcutaneous tissue flaps. These undermined skin flaps can suffer marginal skin loss, fat necrosis, and delayed wound healing. The authors propose that preserving the periumbilical rectus abdominis perforators to the abdominal skin flaps will decrease the prevalence of postoperative superficial wound complications. A retrospective review of 66 consecutive, large, midline hernia repairs using a separation of parts technique was undertaken to identify any correlation between the preservation of periumbilical rectus abdominis perforators to the skin flaps and the prevalence of postoperative wound complications. In 25 cases, the standard separation of parts technique was performed with wide undermining of the skin and subcutaneous tissues. In 41 cases, the modified separation of parts technique was performed with maintenance of the periumbilical rectus abdominis perforators to the abdominal skin flaps. Comparison of these two groups revealed no difference in age; sex; body mass index; initial hernia size on physical examination; prevalence of smoking, diabetes, or steroid use; or prevalence of a simultaneous intraabdominal procedure. A statistically significant difference was noted in postoperative wound complications between the two groups (p < 0.05). Of patients who underwent the standard separation of parts technique, five of 25 patients (20 percent) had wound complications as compared with one of 41 patients (2 percent) who underwent the modified separation of parts technique with perforator preservation. The postoperative hernia recurrence (7 percent and 8 percent, respectively) and hematoma (4 percent and 2 percent, respectively) rates were similar in both groups. A trend of increased wound complications was noted when separation of parts was combined with an intraabdominal procedure (18 percent versus 3 percent, p = 0.08). Interestingly, within this group, the modified separation of parts technique with preservation of the periumbilical rectus abdominis perforators demonstrated a trend of fewer wound complications as compared with the standard separation of parts technique (7 percent versus 31 percent, p = 0.15). The authors conclude that preservation of the periumbilical rectus abdominis perforators significantly reduces the prevalence of major postoperative superficial wound complications in separation of parts hernia repairs. Simultaneous intraabdominal procedures with separation of parts hernia repairs seem to increase the prevalence of wound complications. This increased prevalence of wound complications seems to be minimized when the modified separation of parts technique is performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12045549     DOI: 10.1097/00006534-200206000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  35 in total

1.  Multilayer myofascial-mesh repair for giant midline incisional hernias: a novel advantageous combination of old and new techniques.

Authors:  Joaquín Picazo-Yeste; Antonio Morandeira-Rivas; Carlos Moreno-Sanz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  A systematic review of the surgical treatment of large incisional hernia.

Authors:  E B Deerenberg; L Timmermans; D P Hogerzeil; J C Slieker; P H C Eilers; J Jeekel; J F Lange
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Revisiting the Anterior Rectus Sheath Repair for Incisional Hernia: A 10-Year Experience.

Authors:  Erica I Hodgman; Mark J Watson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Retromuscular Sublay Technique for Ventral Hernia Repair.

Authors:  Irfan A Rhemtulla; John P Fischer
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Component separations.

Authors:  Lior Heller; Colton H McNichols; Oscar M Ramirez
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.314

6.  Selective muscle botulinum toxin A component paralysis in complex ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  K E Elstner; J W Read; J Saunders; P H Cosman; O Rodriguez-Acevedo; A S W Jacombs; R T Martins; N Ibrahim
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.739

Review 7.  Endoscopic versus open component separation: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Noah J Switzer; Mark A Dykstra; Richdeep S Gill; Stephanie Lim; Erica Lester; Christopher de Gara; Xinzhe Shi; Daniel W Birch; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Frailty predicts morbidity, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  W J Joseph; N G Cuccolo; M E Baron; I Chow; E H Beers
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Technical considerations in performing posterior component separation with transverse abdominis muscle release.

Authors:  W Gibreel; M G Sarr; M Rosen; Y Novitsky
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.739

10.  Role of Indocyanine Green to Mitigate Wound Complications in Component Separation Technique for Ventral Hernia Repair-Our Early Experience.

Authors:  Jignesh Gandhi; Amay Banker; Sadashiv Chaudhari; Pravin Shinde
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.