Literature DB >> 12044939

Large genome rearrangements as a primary cause of aging.

Jan Vijg1, Martijn E T Dollé.   

Abstract

In his introductory chapter of the Mutation Research special issue on 'Genetic Instability and Aging', the late Bernard Strehler provided some historical perspectives on the long-standing hypothesis that aging is primarily caused by changes in the genome of somatic cells (Strehler, 1995, Mutat. Res. 338 (1995) 3). Based on his own findings of a loss of ribosomal RNA gene copies in postmitotic tissues of dogs as well as humans during aging, his main conclusion was that deletional mutations are more likely than point mutations to be a main causal factor in aging. To directly assess the levels of different types of spontaneous mutations in organs and tissues during aging, we have used a mouse model harboring a chromosomally integrated cluster of lacZ-containing plasmids that can be recovered and analyzed in Escherichia coli. Our results indicate the accumulation of mutations in some but not all organs of the mouse with significant differences in mutational spectra. In addition to point mutations, genome rearrangements involving up to 66 Mb of genomic DNA appeared to be a major component of the mutational spectra. Physical characterization of the breakpoints of such rearrangements indicated their possible origin by erroneous, non-homologous DNA double-strand break repair. Based on their increased occurrence during aging in some tissues and their often very large size, we have designed a model for an aging tissue in terms of a cellular mosaic with a gradual increase in genome rearrangements that leads to functional senescence, neoplastic transformation or death of individual cells by disrupting nuclear architecture and patterns of gene regulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044939     DOI: 10.1016/s0047-6374(02)00028-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev        ISSN: 0047-6374            Impact factor:   5.432


  51 in total

Review 1.  Somatic mutations in aging, cancer and neurodegeneration.

Authors:  Scott R Kennedy; Lawrence A Loeb; Alan J Herr
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 5.432

2.  DNA end joining becomes less efficient and more error-prone during cellular senescence.

Authors:  Andrei Seluanov; David Mittelman; Olivia M Pereira-Smith; John H Wilson; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Cancer: a lower bar for senescence.

Authors:  Manuel Serrano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 4.  DNA double-strand breaks: a potential causative factor for mammalian aging?

Authors:  Han Li; James R Mitchell; Paul Hasty
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.432

5.  Tissue-specific differences in the accumulation of sequence rearrangements with age.

Authors:  Dominika M Wiktor-Brown; Werner Olipitz; Carrie A Hendricks; Rebecca E Rugo; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2008-03-20

6.  Changes in the level and distribution of Ku proteins during cellular senescence.

Authors:  Andrei Seluanov; Jacquelynn Danek; Nola Hause; Vera Gorbunova
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2007-08-07

Review 7.  Declining cellular fitness with age promotes cancer initiation by selecting for adaptive oncogenic mutations.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; James DeGregori
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-10-12

8.  Age related shift in the mutation spectra of germline and somatic NF2 mutations: hypothetical role of DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  D G R Evans; E R Maher; M E Baser
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 6.318

9.  Effect of Ames dwarfism and caloric restriction on spontaneous DNA mutation frequency in different mouse tissues.

Authors:  Ana Maria Garcia; Rita A Busuttil; R Brent Calder; Martijn E T Dollé; Vivian Diaz; C Alex McMahan; Andrzej Bartke; James Nelson; Robert Reddick; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-05-13       Impact factor: 5.432

Review 10.  Aging genomes: a necessary evil in the logic of life.

Authors:  Jan Vijg
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-01-25       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.