Literature DB >> 12044750

Idiosyncratic left-right asymmetries of saccadic latencies: examination in a gap paradigm.

Hitoshi Honda1.   

Abstract

Subjects were given reflexive- and voluntary-saccade tasks using five different gap intervals (0-500 ms) between the fixation point offset and the target onset and an overlap paradigm (i.e., the fixation point remained on during the target presentation). In the first experiment, targets were monocularly presented, and the latencies of reflexive saccades to a peripheral target were compared between the left and right visual fields in which targets were presented. The data averaged over subjects did not show a significant difference of saccade latencies between the two visual fields. However, individual subjects showed strong left/right asymmetries of saccade latencies: six out of the 12 subjects that participated made a saccade more rapidly to the right than to the left, and two other subjects showed the reverse result. In these cases, the left/right asymmetry was observed on both gap and overlap trials. The saccade latencies were not affected by the hemiretina to which a target was projected. The second experiment was conducted to identify conditions under which the left/right asymmetry can be reproduced. For this purpose, five subjects were given both reflexive-saccade and voluntary-saccade tasks. In the latter task, a cue stimulus for generating saccades was given at the central fixation point. Regardless of whether saccades were made reflexively or voluntarily, and whether the targets were viewed monocularly or binocularly, each subject showed the same pattern of left/right asymmetries of saccade latencies. The results were interpreted as showing that a visuo-spatial attentional bias specific to individual subjects is involved in generating idiosyncratic left/right asymmetries of saccade latencies.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044750     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(02)00050-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  16 in total

1.  Effects of direction on saccadic performance in relation to lateral preferences.

Authors:  T S Constantinidis; N Smyrnis; I Evdokimidis; N C Stefanis; D Avramopoulos; I Giouzelis; C N Stefanis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Saccade performance in the nasal and temporal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Gunnar Asgeirsson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of visual environment complexity on saccade performance in humans with different functional asymmetry profiles.

Authors:  O V Kolesnikova; L V Tereshchenko; A V Latanov; V V Shulgovskii
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-08-04

4.  Greater disruption to control of voluntary saccades in autistic disorder than Asperger's disorder: evidence for greater cerebellar involvement in autism?

Authors:  Chloe Stanley-Cary; Nicole Rinehart; Bruce Tonge; Owen White; Joanne Fielding
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Saccadic instabilities and voluntary saccadic behaviour.

Authors:  E Gowen; R V Abadi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Saccades during symmetrical vergence.

Authors:  Olivier A Coubard; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.

Authors:  Aline Bompas; Thomas Sterling; Robert D Rafal; Petroc Sumner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Violating the main sequence: asymmetries in saccadic peak velocities for saccades into the temporal versus nasal hemifields.

Authors:  Omar I Jóhannesson; Arni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Effects of saccade training on express saccade proportions, saccade latencies, and peak velocities: an investigation of nasal/temporal differences.

Authors:  Ómar I Jóhannesson; Jay A Edelman; Bjarki Dalsgaard Sigurþórsson; Árni Kristjánsson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Interocular yoking in human saccades examined by mutual information analysis.

Authors:  Masaki Maruyama; Peter Bc Fenwick; Andreas A Ioannides
Journal:  Nonlinear Biomed Phys       Date:  2010-06-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.