Literature DB >> 12044509

Does the histological subtype of high-grade central osteosarcoma influence the response to treatment with chemotherapy and does it affect overall survival? A study on 570 patients of two consecutive trials of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup.

E I Hauben1, S Weeden, J Pringle, E A Van Marck, P C W Hogendoorn.   

Abstract

Large randomised trials are mandatory when one wants to examine the effects of different aspects (such as the treatment modality) of a pathological condition on the overall outcome. This is especially true when studying a disease in which there is a multifactorial influence on progression and outcome such as osteosarcoma. Data on 570 patients with biopsy-proven primary central osteosarcoma of an extremity included in two consecutive studies of the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) were analysed in order to evaluate if the histological subtype of the biopsy specimen correlated with the subtype of osteosarcoma represented in the resected specimen, if there was a relationship between the histological subtype and overall survival and if there was a relationship between the histological subtype and histological response to chemotherapy. High-grade osteosarcoma, as defined by established criteria, was subtyped as either conventional, chondroblastic, teleangiectatic, small cell, fibroblastic, osteoclast rich, anaplastic and sclerotic/osteoblastic well differentiated. A panel of experienced pathologists with a special interest in bone pathology was appointed to review the histological diagnosis and to assess the tumour response to chemotherapy on the resected specimen of each patient entered into the trials. Subtyping on the biopsy specimen proved to be highly representative for the subtype of the whole tumour. In 102 patients for which subtyping was performed on the biopsy and the resected specimens, there were only two discrepancies. Of the 568 patients for whom subtype was available, 404 (71%) were of the conventional type, 54 (10%) were chondroblastic, 53 (9%) had fibroblastic tumours and the remainder consisted of rare subtypes. A good response to preoperative chemotherapy was defined as 90% or more necrosis. The proportion of patients responding well to chemotherapy differed significantly between subtypes (Chi-square test statistics=11.44, P=0.01 on 3 degrees of freedom (d.f.)). In comparison with the conventional subtype, there was a higher proportion of good responders in the fibroblastic group and a lower proportion of good responders in the chondroblastic group. Good responders had a significantly better survival than patients who responded poorly to the pre-operative chemotherapy (logrank statistic=25.20, P<0.01 on 1 df). Survival did not differ significantly according to subtype (logrank statistic=2.72, P=0.44 on 3 df), although there was a suggestion that patients with chondroblastic tumours experienced a better long-term survival. This large set of prospectively-collected data provides important information on the relationship between pathological subtype, histological response and survival. Histological response has a known prognostic effect on survival, and we have shown that the rates of response differ by subtype. There is some evidence from this study that the specific histological subtypes, i.e. the chondroblastic subtype, experience better survival. However, despite this large multi-institutional study, we have insufficient numbers of non-conventional tumours to examine this unambiguously for these subsets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12044509     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(02)00037-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  41 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion-weighted imaging in musculoskeletal radiology-clinical applications and future directions.

Authors:  Nicholas Bhojwani; Peter Szpakowski; Sasan Partovi; Martin H Maurer; Ulrich Grosse; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Lisa Zipp-Partovi; Nathan Fergus; Christos Kosmas; Konstantin Nikolaou; Mark R Robbin
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Pathology of primary malignant bone and cartilage tumours.

Authors:  L B Rozeman; A M Cleton-Jansen; P C W Hogendoorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  The role of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in sarcoma: update and dispute.

Authors:  Jilong Yang; Zhiwu Ren; Xiaoling Du; Mengze Hao; Wenya Zhou
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2014-10-27

4.  Survival from high-grade localised extremity osteosarcoma: combined results and prognostic factors from three European Osteosarcoma Intergroup randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J S Whelan; R C Jinks; A McTiernan; M R Sydes; J M Hook; L Trani; B Uscinska; V Bramwell; I J Lewis; M A Nooij; M van Glabbeke; R J Grimer; P C W Hogendoorn; A H M Taminiau; H Gelderblom
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Microarray analysis identifies distinct gene expression profiles associated with histological subtype in human osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Bernd Kubista; Florian Klinglmueller; Martin Bilban; Martin Pfeiffer; Richard Lass; Alexander Giurea; Phillipp T Funovics; Cyril Toma; Martin Dominkus; Rainer Kotz; Theresia Thalhammer; Klemens Trieb; Teresa Zettl; Christian F Singer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  The biology of small leucine-rich proteoglycans in bone pathophysiology.

Authors:  Dragana Nikitovic; John Aggelidakis; Marian F Young; Renato V Iozzo; Nikos K Karamanos; George N Tzanakakis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Axial skeletal osteosarcoma: a 25-year monoinstitutional experience in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Cristina Meazza; Roberto Luksch; Primo Daolio; Marta Podda; Alessandro Luzzati; Alessandro Gronchi; Antonina Parafioriti; Lorenza Gandola; Paola Collini; Andrea Ferrari; Michela Casanova; Monica Terenziani; Filippo Spreafico; Daniela Polastri; Veronica Biassoni; Elisabetta Schiavello; Emilia Pecori; Maura Massimino
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 3.064

8.  Telangiectatic osteosarcoma: a review of 87 cases.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Giulia Trovarelli; Stefano Ferrari; Piero Picci; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Cytologic anaplasia is a prognostic factor in osteosarcoma biopsies, but mitotic rate or extent of spontaneous tumor necrosis are not: a critique of the College of American Pathologists Bone Biopsy template.

Authors:  Justin Mm Cates; William D Dupont
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Prognostic factors in the survival of patients diagnosed with primary non-metastatic osteosarcoma with a poor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rosalvo Zósimo Bispo Júnior; Olavo Pires de Camargo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.