Literature DB >> 12043750

Community entry in conducting rural focus groups: process, legitimacy, and lessons learned.

Shannon L Smith1, Kelly Blake, Carol R Olson, Irene Tessaro.   

Abstract

This article explores the value of community collaboration in a qualitative study of diabetes. In 1999, the Appalachian Diabetes Coalition of West Virginia University's Prevention Research Center employed a statewide effort to conduct focus groups in West Virginia to elicit cultural perspectives on diabetes and its management. The success of this research depended on community participation at many levels, particularly because of the rural, often geographically isolated community structure of the state. The researchers' entry into small communities and the involvement of local residents in focus groups was possible with the collaboration of the West Virginia Rural Health Education Partnerships program and the West Virginia University Extension Service, both of which played primary roles as community gatekeepers in helping the research team access and involve rural areas. This collaboration reinforced the value of a two-tiered approach in enlisting local resources. These relationships resulted in beneficial outcomes to all partners. Researchers benefited by gaining entry to communities, and the community organizations benefited by gaining a better understanding of the diabetic population to assist in planning programs. Working with well-established community groups with strong community ties is crucial when gaining entry for research and interventions. The identification and involvement of trusted, accessible members of rural communities gives research local legitimacy, ensures adequate participation and effective data collection, and permits entry into remote communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12043750     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2002.tb00883.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rural Health        ISSN: 0890-765X            Impact factor:   4.333


  2 in total

Review 1.  Conflict of interest issues in informed consent for research on human subjects: a South Asian perspective.

Authors:  Aamir M Jafarey
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Knowledge and perceptions of diabetes in an Appalachian population.

Authors:  Irene Tessaro; Shannon L Smith; Sheila Rye
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.