Literature DB >> 12043416

[How was the referral sheet interpreted? Questionnaire on priority assessment of patients referred to orthopedic surgeons showed great differences between reviewers].

Sofia Löfvendahl1, Staffan Hellberg, Marianne Hanning.   

Abstract

A questionnaire containing 15 simulated referrals for orthopedic specialist treatment was distributed to physicians in charge of determining priority. They were asked to consider each referral in a normal way and grade them in order of priority. The results overall showed great divergence; units with longer waiting lists assigned the patients lower priority than did units with short waiting lists. There is a pressing need for national guidelines in order to improve the referral sheet as an instrument of communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12043416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lakartidningen        ISSN: 0023-7205


  1 in total

1.  Prioritization of patients on scheduled waiting lists: validation of a scoring system for hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barbara L Conner-Spady; Gordon Arnett; John J McGurran; Tom W Noseworthy
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.089

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.