BACKGROUND: A deviation of the subjective visual vertical (svv) is often found in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions and in most cases the deviation is transitory and easy to compensate. The purpose of the study was to find out if there is a correlation between deviation of the svv and objective cyclodeviation of the retina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients (10 females and 10 males aged between 16 and 78 years) with acute vestibular disease were enrolled. Only patients with a binocular deviation of the svv of more than 2 degrees and/or a difference between the monocular deviation of more than 1.5 degrees were included. The svv was examined monocular in a darkened room and after pupil dilatation, fundus photography was performed on each eye. The angle between papilla and macula was measured manually. RESULTS: We found a good qualitative correlation between svv (mean 7.9 degrees) and objective cyclodeviation (mean 10.6 degrees). CONCLUSION: In contrast to the binocular measurement of the svv, we found good correlation between the monocular svv and the objective cyclorotation measured with fundus photography. It is not yet clear which part of the vestibular system is responsible for cyclodeviation. Because of our results we recommend monocular measurement of the svv in clinical examinations.
BACKGROUND: A deviation of the subjective visual vertical (svv) is often found in patients with unilateral peripheral vestibular lesions and in most cases the deviation is transitory and easy to compensate. The purpose of the study was to find out if there is a correlation between deviation of the svv and objective cyclodeviation of the retina. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 20 patients (10 females and 10 males aged between 16 and 78 years) with acute vestibular disease were enrolled. Only patients with a binocular deviation of the svv of more than 2 degrees and/or a difference between the monocular deviation of more than 1.5 degrees were included. The svv was examined monocular in a darkened room and after pupil dilatation, fundus photography was performed on each eye. The angle between papilla and macula was measured manually. RESULTS: We found a good qualitative correlation between svv (mean 7.9 degrees) and objective cyclodeviation (mean 10.6 degrees). CONCLUSION: In contrast to the binocular measurement of the svv, we found good correlation between the monocular svv and the objective cyclorotation measured with fundus photography. It is not yet clear which part of the vestibular system is responsible for cyclodeviation. Because of our results we recommend monocular measurement of the svv in clinical examinations.