Anjali Jain1, John Concato, John M Leventhal. 1. Section of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA. ajain@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We conducted a critical review of the many studies that have tried to determine whether breastfeeding has a beneficial effect on intellect. DESIGN/ METHODS: By searching Medline and the references of selected articles, we identified publications that evaluated the association between breastfeeding and cognitive outcomes. We then appraised and described each study according to 8 principles of clinical epidemiology: 1) study design, 2) target population: whether full-term infants were studied, 3) sample size, 4) collection of feeding data: whether studies met 4 standards of quality- suitable definition and duration of breastfeeding, and appropriate timing and source of feeding data, 5) control of susceptibility bias: whether studies controlled for socioeconomic status and stimulation of the child, 6) blinding: whether observers of the outcome were blind to feeding status, 7) outcome: whether a standardized individual test of general intelligence at an age older than 2 years was used, and 8) format of results: whether studies reported an effect size or some other strategy to interpret the clinical impact of results. RESULTS: We identified 40 pertinent publications from 1929 to February 2001. Twenty-seven (68%) concluded that breastfeeding promotes intelligence. Many studies, however, had methodological flaws. Only 2 papers studied full-term infants and met all 4 standards of high-quality feeding data, controlled for 2 critical confounders, reported blinding, used an appropriate test, and allowed the reader to interpret the clinical significance of the findings with an effect size. Of these 2, 1 study concluded that the effect of breastfeeding on intellect was significant, and the other did not. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of studies concluded that breastfeeding promotes intelligence, the evidence from higher quality studies is less persuasive.
BACKGROUND: We conducted a critical review of the many studies that have tried to determine whether breastfeeding has a beneficial effect on intellect. DESIGN/ METHODS: By searching Medline and the references of selected articles, we identified publications that evaluated the association between breastfeeding and cognitive outcomes. We then appraised and described each study according to 8 principles of clinical epidemiology: 1) study design, 2) target population: whether full-term infants were studied, 3) sample size, 4) collection of feeding data: whether studies met 4 standards of quality- suitable definition and duration of breastfeeding, and appropriate timing and source of feeding data, 5) control of susceptibility bias: whether studies controlled for socioeconomic status and stimulation of the child, 6) blinding: whether observers of the outcome were blind to feeding status, 7) outcome: whether a standardized individual test of general intelligence at an age older than 2 years was used, and 8) format of results: whether studies reported an effect size or some other strategy to interpret the clinical impact of results. RESULTS: We identified 40 pertinent publications from 1929 to February 2001. Twenty-seven (68%) concluded that breastfeeding promotes intelligence. Many studies, however, had methodological flaws. Only 2 papers studied full-term infants and met all 4 standards of high-quality feeding data, controlled for 2 critical confounders, reported blinding, used an appropriate test, and allowed the reader to interpret the clinical significance of the findings with an effect size. Of these 2, 1 study concluded that the effect of breastfeeding on intellect was significant, and the other did not. CONCLUSION: Although the majority of studies concluded that breastfeeding promotes intelligence, the evidence from higher quality studies is less persuasive.
Authors: Talia Jacobi-Polishook; Carmel T Collins; Thomas R Sullivan; Karen Simmer; Matthew W Gillman; Robert A Gibson; Maria Makrides; Mandy B Belfort Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2016-05-24 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: Catherine M Herba; Sabine Roza; Paul Govaert; Albert Hofman; Vincent Jaddoe; Frank C Verhulst; Henning Tiemeier Journal: Matern Child Nutr Date: 2012-11-20 Impact factor: 3.092
Authors: Kimford J Meador; Gus A Baker; Nancy Browning; Morris J Cohen; Rebecca L Bromley; Jill Clayton-Smith; Laura A Kalayjian; Andres Kanner; Joyce D Liporace; Page B Pennell; Michael Privitera; David W Loring Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2014-08 Impact factor: 16.193