S A K S Amer1, T C Li, C Bygrave, A Sprigg, H Saravelos, I D Cooke. 1. Department of Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, The Jessop Wing, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield S10 2SF, UK. s.amer@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This prospective observational study was undertaken to evaluate the reliability and consistency of ultrasound diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Eighteen women with clinical and biochemical features suggestive of PCOS and nine normal control women underwent transvaginal ultrasound scan by a single ultrasonographer. The 27 ovarian scans were video-recorded and the recordings were later edited and arranged randomly so that each record appeared twice at random on the tape producing a total of 54 ovarian scans. Four experienced observers independently reviewed the recordings. The observers scored each case as follows: normal, possible polycystic ovary (PCO) and definite PCO. RESULTS: The mean intra-observer agreement was 69.4% (kappa = 0.54) and the mean inter-observer agreement was 51% (kappa = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the currently used ultrasonographic criteria for the diagnosis of polycystic ovaries do have significant intra-observer and inter-observer variability and as such must be considered subjective. Transvaginal ultrasonography alone may not therefore be a reliable method of diagnosing or excluding PCOS.
BACKGROUND: This prospective observational study was undertaken to evaluate the reliability and consistency of ultrasound diagnosis of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). METHODS: Eighteen women with clinical and biochemical features suggestive of PCOS and nine normal control women underwent transvaginal ultrasound scan by a single ultrasonographer. The 27 ovarian scans were video-recorded and the recordings were later edited and arranged randomly so that each record appeared twice at random on the tape producing a total of 54 ovarian scans. Four experienced observers independently reviewed the recordings. The observers scored each case as follows: normal, possible polycystic ovary (PCO) and definite PCO. RESULTS: The mean intra-observer agreement was 69.4% (kappa = 0.54) and the mean inter-observer agreement was 51% (kappa = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the currently used ultrasonographic criteria for the diagnosis of polycystic ovaries do have significant intra-observer and inter-observer variability and as such must be considered subjective. Transvaginal ultrasonography alone may not therefore be a reliable method of diagnosing or excluding PCOS.
Authors: V Bolón-Canedo; E Ataer-Cansizoglu; D Erdogmus; J Kalpathy-Cramer; O Fontenla-Romero; A Alonso-Betanzos; M F Chiang Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Marla E Lujan; Eric D Brooks; Anna L Kepley; Donna R Chizen; Roger A Pierson; Andrew K Peppin Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol Date: 2010-04-09 Impact factor: 2.998
Authors: Marla E Lujan; Donna R Chizen; Andrew K Peppin; Stefan Kriegler; David A Leswick; Terri G Bloski; Roger A Pierson Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol Date: 2008-07-18 Impact factor: 5.211