Literature DB >> 12040918

Determination of mercury in blood, urine and saliva for the biological monitoring of an exposure from amalgam fillings in a group with self-reported adverse health effects.

Holger Zimmer1, Heidi Ludwig, Michael Bader, Josef Bailer, Peter Eickholz, Hans Jörg Staehle, Gerhard Triebig.   

Abstract

It has been argued that the release of mercury from amalgam fillings is of toxicological relevance. The aim of the study was to determine the internal mercury exposure of two groups differing in their attitude towards possible health hazards by mercury from amalgam fillings. It was to be examined if the two groups differ with regard to the mercury concentration in different biological matrices and to compare the results with current reference values. Blood, urine and saliva samples were analyzed from 40 female subjects who claimed to suffer from serious health damage due to amalgam fillings ("amalgam sensitive subjects"). 43 female control subjects did not claim any association ("amalgam non-sensitive controls"). Mercury was determined by means of cold vapour atomic absorption spectrometry. Number and surfaces of amalgam fillings were determined by dentists for each subject. Median (range) mercury levels in blood were 2.35 (0.25-13.40) micrograms/l for "amalgam sensitive subjects" and 2.40 (0.25-10.50) micrograms/l for "amalgam non-sensitive controls". In urine, the median mercury concentrations were 1.55 (0.06-14.70) micrograms/l and 1.88 (0.20-8.43) micrograms/g creatinine respectively. No significant differences could be found between the two groups. Mercury levels in blood and urine of the examined subjects were within the range of background levels in the general population including persons with amalgam fillings. Stimulated saliva contained 76.4 (6.7-406.0) micrograms mercury/l in "amalgam sensitive subjects" and 57.0 (2.8-559.0) micrograms mercury/l in controls (not significant). Mercury levels in saliva did not correlate with the concentrations in blood and urine, but merely with the number of amalgam fillings or of the filling surfaces. Mercury in saliva is therefore not recommended for a biological monitoring.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12040918     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  10 in total

1.  Toxic heavy metals in human blood in relation to certain food and environmental samples in Kerala, South India.

Authors:  Anitha Jose; Joseph George Ray
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Positive patch test for mercury possibly from exposure to amalgam.

Authors:  Tomio Mori; Kazuhiro Sato; Yukinori Kusaka; Toshiko Ido; Masanobu Kumagiri; Toshiyuki Ogasawara; Kazuo Sano
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 3.674

3.  Dental amalgam and psychosocial status: the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.

Authors:  D C Bellinger; F Trachtenberg; A Zhang; M Tavares; D Daniel; S McKinlay
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 4.  Human exposure and health effects of inorganic and elemental mercury.

Authors:  Jung-Duck Park; Wei Zheng
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2012-11-29

5.  Is dental amalgam safe for humans? The opinion of the scientific committee of the European Commission.

Authors:  Joachim Mutter
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.646

Review 6.  The search for reliable biomarkers of disease in multiple chemical sensitivity and other environmental intolerances.

Authors:  Chiara De Luca; Desanka Raskovic; Valeria Pacifico; Jeffrey Chung Sheun Thai; Liudmila Korkina
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Determination of Mercury Exposure among Dental Health Workers in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand.

Authors:  Somsiri Decharat; Piriyaluk Phethuayluk; Supandee Maneelok; Phayong Thepaksorn
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2014-10-01

8.  Association between Dental Amalgam Filling and Essential Tremor: A Nationwide Population-Based Case Control Study in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chien-Fang Tseng; Kun-Huang Chen; Hui-Chieh Yu; Yu-Chao Chang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Methylmercury-induced cytotoxicity and oxidative biochemistry impairment in dental pulp stem cells: the first toxicological findings.

Authors:  Renata Duarte de Souza-Rodrigues; Bruna Puty; Laís Bonfim; Lygia Sega Nogueira; Priscila Cunha Nascimento; Leonardo Oliveira Bittencourt; Roberta Souza D'Almeida Couto; Carlos Augusto Galvão Barboza; Edivaldo Herculano Corrêa de Oliveira; Marcia Martins Marques; Rafael Rodrigues Lima
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A Prospective Clinical Study on Blood Mercury Levels Following Endodontic Root-end Surgery with Amalgam.

Authors:  Masoud Saatchi; Elham Shadmehr; Seyed Morteza Talebi; Mohsen Nazeri
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-08-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.