Literature DB >> 12040280

A phase III randomized trial of combined chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Tae-You Kim1, Sung Hyun Yang, Se Hoon Lee, Young-Seok Park, Yung Hyuck Im, Won-Ki Kang, Sung Hwan Ha, Chan Il Park, Dae Seog Heo, Yung-Jue Bang, Noe Kyeong Kim.   

Abstract

A phase III randomized trial was conducted to investigate whether induction chemotherapy followed by radiation can influence survival as compared with radiation alone in unresectable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (LADNSCLC). A total of 101 patients with unresectable stage IIIA or IIIB NSCLC were enrolled. Patients were stratified by performance status, weight loss, histology and stage, and then randomized to receive combined chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy alone. Radiotherapy was administered in 1.8 Gy to 2.0 Gy standard fractions daily 5 times weekly for a total dose of 60 Gy to 65 Gy. The combined group received induction of cisplatin, etoposide, and vinblastine (PEV) chemotherapy with cisplatin 20 mg/m2 on days 1 to 5, etoposide 100 mg/m2 on days 2 to 4, and vinblastine 6 mg/m2 on day 1, which wasrepeated every 3 weeks for 3 courses, after which time the patients underwent radiotherapy. Of 101 patients registered, 89 patients (43 combined, 46 radiotherapy alone) were eligible for analysis. The response rates for the combined and radiotherapy groups were 65% (28/43) and 70% (32/46), respectively. The median survival time (MST) showed a tendency to be more prolonged in the combined group than in the group receiving radiotherapy alone (13.8 vs. 8.5 months). The MST in patients with nonsquamous histology was strikingly prolonged in the combined group as compared with the radiotherapy group (14 vs. 3.6 months, p 0.027). Likewise, the MST in patients with stage IIIB was significantly prolonged in the combined group as compared with the radiotherapy group (11.1 vs. 7.2 months, p 0.045). Together, the MST of the high-risk group with nonsquamous or stage IIIB was significantly higher in the combined group than that seen in the radiotherapy group (11.6 vs. 8 months, p 0.046), whereas the MST of the low-risk group, defined as having both squamous histology and stage IIIA, was similar in the two treatment groups (18.3 vs. 20.8 months, p = 0.293). In conclusion, induction PEV chemotherapy plus radiotherapy is superior to radiotherapy alone in high-risk subsets of unresectable LAD-NSCLC and therapeutic strategy should be based on the identification of prognostic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12040280     DOI: 10.1097/00000421-200206000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  10 in total

1.  The role of taxanes in the management of gastroesphageal cancer.

Authors:  Paola Jimenez; Aditya Pathak; Alexandria T Phan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Adaptive radiotherapy in lung cancer: dosimetric benefits and clinical outcome.

Authors:  T Kataria; D Gupta; S S Bisht; N Karthikeyan; S Goyal; L Pushpan; A Abhishek; H B Govardhan; V Kumar; K Sharma; S Jain; T Basu; A Srivastava
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with weekly nedaplatin versus radiotherapy alone in elderly patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  F Chen; P Hu; N Liang; J Xie; S Yu; T Tian; Jingxin Zhang; G Deng; Jiandong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Pulmonary resection after chemoradiotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the impact of presurgical radiation therapy.

Authors:  Takeshi Shiraishi; Masafumi Hiratsuka; Jun Yanagisawa; Sou Miyahara; Yasuhiro Yoshida; Yoshifumi Makimoto; Daisuke Hamatake; Shin-ichi Yamashita; Akinori Iwasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 5.  Surveillance imaging following definitive radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: What is the clinical impact?

Authors:  Brandon A Dyer; Megan E Daly
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.929

6.  Hypofractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy for elderly patients with stage IIB-IV nonsmall cell lung cancer who are ineligible for or refuse other treatment modalities.

Authors:  Sana D Karam; Zachary D Horne; Robert L Hong; Don McRae; David Duhamel; Nadim M Nasr
Journal:  Lung Cancer (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-03

7.  Efficacy of chemoradiotherapy versus radiation alone in patients with inoperable locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Ming-Szu Hung; Yi-Fang Wu; Yi-Chuan Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

8.  Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors combined with thoracic radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of single-arm trials.

Authors:  Ruifeng Liu; Shihong Wei; Qiuning Zhang; Xueliang Zhang; Hongtao Luo; Jinhui Tian; Yi Li; Long Ge; Xiaohu Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  In vitro interaction between ecteinascidin 743 (ET-743) and radiation, in relation to its cell cycle effects.

Authors:  C Simoens; A E C Korst; C M J De Pooter; H A J Lambrechts; G G O Pattyn; G T Faircloth; F Lardon; J B Vermorken
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Comparative study of the radiosensitizing and cell cycle effects of vinflunine and vinorelbine, in vitro.

Authors:  Cindy Simoens; Filip Lardon; Bea Pauwels; Christel M J De Pooter; Hilde A J Lambrechts; Greet G O Pattyn; Fabienne Breillout; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 4.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.