Literature DB >> 12040188

A comparison of whole-genome shotgun-derived mouse chromosome 16 and the human genome.

Richard J Mural1, Mark D Adams, Eugene W Myers, Hamilton O Smith, George L Gabor Miklos, Ron Wides, Aaron Halpern, Peter W Li, Granger G Sutton, Joe Nadeau, Steven L Salzberg, Robert A Holt, Chinnappa D Kodira, Fu Lu, Lin Chen, Zuoming Deng, Carlos C Evangelista, Weiniu Gan, Thomas J Heiman, Jiayin Li, Zhenya Li, Gennady V Merkulov, Natalia V Milshina, Ashwinikumar K Naik, Rong Qi, Bixiong Chris Shue, Aihui Wang, Jian Wang, Xin Wang, Xianghe Yan, Jane Ye, Shibu Yooseph, Qi Zhao, Liansheng Zheng, Shiaoping C Zhu, Kendra Biddick, Randall Bolanos, Arthur L Delcher, Ian M Dew, Daniel Fasulo, Michael J Flanigan, Daniel H Huson, Saul A Kravitz, Jason R Miller, Clark M Mobarry, Knut Reinert, Karin A Remington, Qing Zhang, Xiangqun H Zheng, Deborah R Nusskern, Zhongwu Lai, Yiding Lei, Wenyan Zhong, Alison Yao, Ping Guan, Rui-Ru Ji, Zhiping Gu, Zhen-Yuan Wang, Fei Zhong, Chunlin Xiao, Chia-Chien Chiang, Mark Yandell, Jennifer R Wortman, Peter G Amanatides, Suzanne L Hladun, Eric C Pratts, Jeffery E Johnson, Kristina L Dodson, Kerry J Woodford, Cheryl A Evans, Barry Gropman, Douglas B Rusch, Eli Venter, Mei Wang, Thomas J Smith, Jarrett T Houck, Donald E Tompkins, Charles Haynes, Debbie Jacob, Soo H Chin, David R Allen, Carl E Dahlke, Robert Sanders, Kelvin Li, Xiangjun Liu, Alexander A Levitsky, William H Majoros, Quan Chen, Ashley C Xia, John R Lopez, Michael T Donnelly, Matthew H Newman, Anna Glodek, Cheryl L Kraft, Marc Nodell, Feroze Ali, Hui-Jin An, Danita Baldwin-Pitts, Karen Y Beeson, Shuang Cai, Mark Carnes, Amy Carver, Parris M Caulk, Angela Center, Yen-Hui Chen, Ming-Lai Cheng, My D Coyne, Michelle Crowder, Steven Danaher, Lionel B Davenport, Raymond Desilets, Susanne M Dietz, Lisa Doup, Patrick Dullaghan, Steven Ferriera, Carl R Fosler, Harold C Gire, Andres Gluecksmann, Jeannine D Gocayne, Jonathan Gray, Brit Hart, Jason Haynes, Jeffery Hoover, Tim Howland, Chinyere Ibegwam, Mena Jalali, David Johns, Leslie Kline, Daniel S Ma, Steven MacCawley, Anand Magoon, Felecia Mann, David May, Tina C McIntosh, Somil Mehta, Linda Moy, Mee C Moy, Brian J Murphy, Sean D Murphy, Keith A Nelson, Zubeda Nuri, Kimberly A Parker, Alexandre C Prudhomme, Vinita N Puri, Hina Qureshi, John C Raley, Matthew S Reardon, Megan A Regier, Yu-Hui C Rogers, Deanna L Romblad, Jakob Schutz, John L Scott, Richard Scott, Cynthia D Sitter, Michella Smallwood, Arlan C Sprague, Erin Stewart, Renee V Strong, Ellen Suh, Karena Sylvester, Reginald Thomas, Ni Ni Tint, Christopher Tsonis, Gary Wang, George Wang, Monica S Williams, Sherita M Williams, Sandra M Windsor, Keriellen Wolfe, Mitchell M Wu, Jayshree Zaveri, Kabir Chaturvedi, Andrei E Gabrielian, Zhaoxi Ke, Jingtao Sun, Gangadharan Subramanian, J Craig Venter, Cynthia M Pfannkoch, Mary Barnstead, Lisa D Stephenson.   

Abstract

The high degree of similarity between the mouse and human genomes is demonstrated through analysis of the sequence of mouse chromosome 16 (Mmu 16), which was obtained as part of a whole-genome shotgun assembly of the mouse genome. The mouse genome is about 10% smaller than the human genome, owing to a lower repetitive DNA content. Comparison of the structure and protein-coding potential of Mmu 16 with that of the homologous segments of the human genome identifies regions of conserved synteny with human chromosomes (Hsa) 3, 8, 12, 16, 21, and 22. Gene content and order are highly conserved between Mmu 16 and the syntenic blocks of the human genome. Of the 731 predicted genes on Mmu 16, 509 align with orthologs on the corresponding portions of the human genome, 44 are likely paralogous to these genes, and 164 genes have homologs elsewhere in the human genome; there are 14 genes for which we could find no human counterpart.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12040188     DOI: 10.1126/science.1069193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  133 in total

1.  Analysis of primate genomic variation reveals a repeat-driven expansion of the human genome.

Authors:  Ge Liu; Shaying Zhao; Jeffrey A Bailey; S Cenk Sahinalp; Can Alkan; Eray Tuzun; Eric D Green; Evan E Eichler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Gene structure prediction in syntenic DNA segments.

Authors:  Jonathan E Moore; James A Lake
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  More on the sequencing of the human genome.

Authors:  Robert H Waterston; Eric S Lander; John E Sulston
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Cross-species sequence comparisons: a review of methods and available resources.

Authors:  Kelly A Frazer; Laura Elnitski; Deanna M Church; Inna Dubchak; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

5.  AVID: A global alignment program.

Authors:  Nick Bray; Inna Dubchak; Lior Pachter
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Automated Gene Ontology annotation for anonymous sequence data.

Authors:  Steffen Hennig; Detlef Groth; Hans Lehrach
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Annotation of the Arabidopsis genome.

Authors:  Jennifer R Wortman; Brian J Haas; Linda I Hannick; Roger K Smith; Rama Maiti; Catherine M Ronning; Agnes P Chan; Chunhui Yu; Mulu Ayele; Catherine A Whitelaw; Owen R White; Christopher D Town
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Examination of sequence homology between human chromosome 20 and the mouse genome: intense conservation of many genomic elements.

Authors:  Lingxiang Zhu; Gary D Swergold; Michael F Seldin
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2003-03-19       Impact factor: 4.132

9.  Estimating genome conservation between crop and model legume species.

Authors:  Hong-Kyu Choi; Jeong-Hwan Mun; Dong-Jin Kim; Hongyan Zhu; Jong-Min Baek; Joanne Mudge; Bruce Roe; Noel Ellis; Jeff Doyle; Gyorgy B Kiss; Nevin D Young; Douglas R Cook
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Brain tumor susceptibility: the role of genetic factors and uses of mouse models to unravel risk.

Authors:  Karlyne M Reilly
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 6.508

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.