Literature DB >> 12039125

Risk factors for rejection of synthetic suburethral slings for stress urinary incontinence: a case-control study.

Jan Persson1, Constantin Iosif, Pål Wølner-Hanssen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify variables associated with rejection of synthetic, suburethral slings used for female stress urinary incontinence.
METHODS: Between 1991 and 1998, gynecologists at our department performed 428 operations for stress urinary incontinence by inserting expanded polytetrafluoroethylene or polyethylene suburethral slings. After suitable exclusions, 386 women followed for at least 24 months after surgery remained for analysis. Of the 386 women, 47 (12.2%) had graft rejection or symptoms associated with rejection within 24 months after surgery, which led to later removal. We compared cases and controls using logistic regression analyses with forward selection to identify independent risk factors and risk markers for rejection.
RESULTS: The rejection rate declined sharply during the years 1993-1994 after introduction of routines that included preoperative prophylactic antibiotics active against anaerobes and repeated preoperative treatment of the vagina with chlorhexidine acetate. After adjusting for potentially confounding variables, surgery after 1993, the gynecologist performing the procedure, and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis remained significantly associated with a lower rejection rate. There was no significant association between rejection and sling material, age at surgery, year of surgery (in one year steps), or concomitant prolapse surgery.
CONCLUSION: Rejection of suburethral slings might be associated with bacterial contamination of the graft, and the rate was decreased with prophylactic antibiotics a repeated and vaginal disinfection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12039125     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)01659-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Erosion, defective healing and extrusion after tension-free urethropexy for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Karin Glavind; Pia Sander
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004-02-14

Review 2.  Double-blinded randomized trial of preoperative antibiotics in midurethral sling procedures and review of the literature.

Authors:  Oz Harmanli; Rebecca L Boyer; Stephen Metz; Elena Tunitsky; Keisha A Jones
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Is antibiotic prophylaxis necessary for midurethral sling procedures? A series of 174 cases without preoperative antibiotics.

Authors:  Oz Harmanli; Eun-Kyung Hong; Rachel Rubin; Keisha A Jones; Rebecca L Boyer; Stephen Metz
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Postoperative erosions of the Mersilene suburethral sling mesh for antiincontinence surgery.

Authors:  Kyle J Wohlrab; Elisabeth A Erekson; Deborah L Myers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-13

5.  Do preoperative cytokine levels offer a prognostic factor for polypropylene mesh erosion after suburethral sling surgery for stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Tomasz Rechberger; Katarzyna Jankiewicz; Aneta Adamiak; Paweł Miotla; Agnieszka Chrobak; Małgorzata Jerzak
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-10-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.