Literature DB >> 12039107

Characteristics of maternal heart rate patterns during labor and delivery.

Dan J Sherman1, Eugenia Frenkel, Yaffa Kurzweil, Anna Padua, Shlomo Arieli, Murat Bahar.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To find patterns characteristic of maternal heart rates recorded by an electronic fetal monitor and compare them with concomitant fetal heart rate (FHR) patterns.
METHODS: Maternal heart rates and FHRs during active labor and delivery were simultaneously recorded in 26 parturients with singleton pregnancies in vertex presentation. The FHRs were obtained by an external ultrasound transducer or via a spiral scalp electrode and maternal heart rates by a triple-wire cable with electrocardiographic electrodes attached to the chest. Representative tracings of 30-60 minutes duration were selected from all stages of labor and after delivery of the placenta. Quantitative assessments were carried out under guidelines from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development after blinding the source of these tracings. Patterns were compared by appropriate statistical analyses.
RESULTS: Baseline maternal heart rates were significantly lower and their variability significantly higher than FHRs during all stages of labor. Maternal heart rates showed no decelerations; the proportion of tracings with accelerations increased as labor advanced, most of them coinciding with uterine contractions or bearing down efforts. The FHRs had both decelerations and accelerations. However, tracings with only accelerations (and no decelerations) were observed in decreasing frequency as labor advanced. Maternal accelerations had higher amplitudes and longer durations than fetal accelerations, especially in the second stage of labor.
CONCLUSION: Maternal heart rate patterns recorded by electronic fetal monitors closely resemble fetal patterns. Baseline "fetal bradycardia," the absence of decelerations in the second stage of labor, and marked accelerations coinciding with uterine contractions may suggest a maternal heart rate rather than an FHR recording.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12039107     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01785-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Toward the improvement in fetal monitoring during labor with the inclusion of maternal heart rate analysis.

Authors:  Hernâni Gonçalves; Paula Pinto; Manuela Silva; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; João Bernardes
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Effects of low maternal heart rate on fetal growth and birthweight.

Authors:  Hein Odendaal; Eduard Kieser; Daan Nel; Lucy Brink; Carlie du Plessis; Coen Groenewald; Maristella Lucchini; William P Fifer; Michael M Myers
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.561

3.  Optode Design Space Exploration for Clinically-robust Non-invasive Fetal Oximetry.

Authors:  Daniel D Fong; Vivek J Srinivasan; Kourosh Vali; Soheil Ghiasi
Journal:  ACM Trans Embed Comput Syst       Date:  2019-10-08       Impact factor: 1.193

4.  Unrecognized maternal heart rate artefact in cases of perinatal mortality reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration from 2009 to 2019: a critical patient safety issue.

Authors:  Daniel J Kiely; Lawrence W Oppenheimer; James C Dornan
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Improvements in fetal heart rate analysis by the removal of maternal-fetal heart rate ambiguities.

Authors:  Paula Pinto; Cristina Costa-Santos; Hernâni Gonçalves; Diogo Ayres-De-Campos; João Bernardes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Electrocardiography versus photoplethysmography in assessment of maternal heart rate variability during labor.

Authors:  Hernâni Gonçalves; Paula Pinto; Manuela Silva; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; João Bernardes
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.