Literature DB >> 12038906

Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?

Douglas G Altman1.   

Abstract

The aim of medical research is to advance scientific knowledge and hence--directly or indirectly--lead to improvements in the treatment and prevention of disease. Each research project should continue systematically from previous research and feed into future research. Each project should contribute beneficially to a slowly evolving body of research. A study should not mislead; otherwise it could adversely affect clinical practice and future research. In 1994 I observed that research papers commonly contain methodological errors, report results selectively, and draw unjustified conclusions. Here I revisit the topic and suggest how journal editors can help.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12038906     DOI: 10.1001/jama.287.21.2765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  50 in total

1.  Quality of impact factors of general medical journals. Quality matters--and the choice of indicator matters too.

Authors:  Miquel Porta
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-04-26

2.  Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice.

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Great expectations.

Authors:  Howard A Rockman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Evidence-based mechanistic reasoning.

Authors:  Jeremy Howick; Paul Glasziou; Jeffrey K Aronson
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Coagulopathy and transfusion strategies in trauma. Overwhelmed by literature, supported by weak evidence.

Authors:  Daniele Poole
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.443

6.  Revitalising rapid responses.

Authors:  Sharon Davies; Tony Delamothe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-04

7.  Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience peer review process, with advice for authors.

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 6.186

8.  Bioanalytical inaccuracy: a threat to the integrity and efficiency of research.

Authors:  Simon N Young; George N Anderson
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 6.186

9.  What errors do peer reviewers detect, and does training improve their ability to detect them?

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Nick Black; Stephen Evans; Fiona Godlee; Lyda Osorio; Richard Smith
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Bias in the research literature and conflict of interest: an issue for publishers, editors, reviewers and authors, and it is not just about the money.

Authors:  Simon N Young
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.