Literature DB >> 12037640

Circular vection during voluntary suppression of optokinetic reflex.

Wolfgang Becker1, Sabine Raab, Reinhart Jürgens.   

Abstract

Optokinetic circular vection (CV) was investigated in 12 subjects using an optokinetic pattern rotating at 15 degrees /s, 30 degrees /s, or 60 degrees /s, and four viewing conditions: FOL, subjects attentively followed details of pattern; STA, subjects stared at the pattern; SUP, subjects suppressed their optokinetic reflex (OKR) voluntarily (this was facilitated by a white, featureless band at eye level which separated the pattern in an upper and lower half); FIX, subjects suppressed OKR by fixating at a stationary fixation point (FP). To quantify CV, subjects pressed a signal button each time they felt rotated by a further 90 degrees; OKR was recorded by electro-oculography. Voluntary suppression of OKR was achieved during 2-70% of stimulus duration. Total apparent self-displacement (cumulated 90 degrees indications) was smallest during FOL, increasing gradually in the order FOL < STA < SUP < FIX (all inequalities significant); CV latency decreased in the same order. Slow eye velocity was identical during FOL and STA, and was reduced by 70-30% during SUP. We conclude from these results: (1) the effect of eye movements on CV depends on whether these are intentional (FOL) or not (STA); (2) the increase in CV during voluntary OKR suppression without FP suggests that afferent motion cues (retinal slip) are processed with larger gain than efferent motion cues (eye movement); hence (3) the enhancement of CV during fixation of FP is not, or not solely, the result of the apparent motion of the FP counter to the direction of pattern movement (Duncker illusion).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12037640     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1104-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  7 in total

1.  Optokinetic circular vection: a test of visual-vestibular conflict models of vection nascensy.

Authors:  R Jürgens; K Kliegl; J Kassubek; W Becker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?

Authors:  Behrang Keshavarz; Bernhard E Riecke; Lawrence J Hettinger; Jennifer L Campos
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-04-20

3.  The Oscillating Potential Model of Visually Induced Vection.

Authors:  Takeharu Seno; Ken-Ichi Sawai; Hidetoshi Kanaya; Toshihiro Wakebe; Masaki Ogawa; Yoshitaka Fujii; Stephen Palmisano
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-24

4.  Vection is the main contributor to motion sickness induced by visual yaw rotation: Implications for conflict and eye movement theories.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Paolo Pretto; Daniel Oberfeld; Heiko Hecht; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Beyond sensory conflict: The role of beliefs and perception in motion sickness.

Authors:  Suzanne A E Nooij; Christopher J Bockisch; Heinrich H Bülthoff; Dominik Straumann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of the Stimulus Duration on the Adaptation of the Optokinetic Afternystagmus.

Authors:  Jan Gygli; Fausto Romano; Christopher J Bockisch; Nina Feddermann-Demont; Dominik Straumann; Giovanni Bertolini
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  More than a cool illusion? Functional significance of self-motion illusion (circular vection) for perspective switches.

Authors:  Bernhard E Riecke; Daniel Feuereissen; John J Rieser; Timothy P McNamara
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-10
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.