Literature DB >> 12037373

Prevalence, distribution and background variables of smooth-bordered tooth wear in teenagers in the hague, the Netherlands.

H M van Rijkom1, G J Truin, J E F M Frencken, K G König, M A van 't Hof, E M Bronkhorst, F J M Roeters.   

Abstract

The purposes of the study were: (1) to assess the prevalence and distribution of smooth-bordered tooth wear in teenagers, and (2) to investigate the relationship between smooth-bordered tooth wear and social background, dietary pattern, drinking habits, oral hygiene practices and caries prevalence. In The Hague, The Netherlands, a sample of 345 10- to 13-year-olds and 400 15- and 16-year-olds was clinically examined. The criteria for the assessment of smooth-bordered tooth wear ('smooth wear') were in line with the diagnostic criteria for erosion developed by Lussi (1996). In the age group 10-13 years, the percentage of subjects with visible smooth wear (SW1 threshold) was 3% and in 1 subject (0.3%), deep smooth enamel wear was found. Due to the low prevalence, the results for this age group were not analysed further. In the age group 15-16 years, the proportion of subjects with visible smooth wear (SW1 threshold) was 30% and that with at least deep smooth enamel wear (SW2 threshold) 11%. Smooth wear into dentine was found in 1 subject. First molars and upper anterior teeth were affected predominantly. A significant effect on visible smooth wear (SW1 threshold) was found for gender and social background. At mouth level, no significant influence was found for dietary patterns, drinking habits or oral hygiene practices. The caries prevalence was similar in subjects with and without smooth wear. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12037373     DOI: 10.1159/000057874

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Caries Res        ISSN: 0008-6568            Impact factor:   4.056


  20 in total

1.  Multifactorial logistic regression analysis of factors associated with the incidence of erosive tooth wear among adults at different ages in Tokyo.

Authors:  Yuichi Kitasako; Y Sasaki; T Takagaki; A Sadr; J Tagami
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  The prevalence and associated risk factors for tooth wear and dental erosion in 15- to 16-year-old schoolchildren in Amman, Jordan.

Authors:  S B Abu-Ghazaleh; G Burnside; A Milosevic
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-01-30

3.  Registration of dental erosive wear on study models and intra-oral photographs.

Authors:  L H Hove; A Mulic; A B Tveit; K R Stenhagen; A B Skaare; I Espelid
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2013-02-07

4.  Mind the gap! A comparison of oral health knowledge between dental, healthcare professionals and the public.

Authors:  W Richards; T Filipponi; V Roberts-Burt
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 5.  Erosive tooth wear - a review on global prevalence and on its prevalence in risk groups.

Authors:  N Schlueter; B Luka
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Dietary behavior and knowledge of dental erosion among Chinese adults.

Authors:  C H Chu; Karie K L Pang; Edward C M Lo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Patterns in consumption of potentially erosive beverages among adolescent school children in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Dien L Gambon; Henk S Brand; Chaimae Boutkabout; Deborah Levie; Enno C I Veerman
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  An epidemiological scoring system for tooth wear and dental erosive wear.

Authors:  Sílvia H De Carvalho Sales-Peres; André De Carvalho Sales-Peres; Juliane A Marsicano; Patricia G De Moura-Grec; Cristiane A P De Carvalho; Adriana R De Freitas; Arsenio Sales-Peres
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 9.  How valid are current diagnostic criteria for dental erosion?

Authors:  Carolina Ganss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 10.  Is diagnosing exposed dentine a suitable tool for grading erosive loss?

Authors:  W Peter Holbrook; Carolina Ganss
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 3.573

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.