H I Hall1, C M Jorgensen, K McDavid, J M Kraft, R Breslow. 1. Surveillance Research Section, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Mailstop K-53, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA 30341, USA. ixh1@cdc.gov
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of protection from sun exposure among US white children ages 6 months to 11 years. METHODS: During the summer of 1998, using telephone directory lists supplemented by random-digit dialing, the authors surveyed parents living in the contiguous United States. They calculated weighted prevalence estimates for protection methods and conducted logistic regression analyses to determine parent and child characteristics predictive of protection behaviors. RESULTS: Parents of 1,055 white children were interviewed. Children spent a median of 20 hours per week outdoors during the summer, of which 10 hours were at school. Sunscreen (61.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 57%, 66%) and shade (26.5%, 95% CI 22%, 31%) were the most frequently reported protection methods. Parents reported higher rates of protection for younger children and children who sunburn easily. CONCLUSIONS: Parents report that a large proportion of white children is protected from sun exposure by one or more methods. Health care providers and educators might encourage the use of all methods of protection, not just sunscreen use, and educate older children to protect themselves from the sun.
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence of protection from sun exposure among US white children ages 6 months to 11 years. METHODS: During the summer of 1998, using telephone directory lists supplemented by random-digit dialing, the authors surveyed parents living in the contiguous United States. They calculated weighted prevalence estimates for protection methods and conducted logistic regression analyses to determine parent and child characteristics predictive of protection behaviors. RESULTS: Parents of 1,055 white children were interviewed. Children spent a median of 20 hours per week outdoors during the summer, of which 10 hours were at school. Sunscreen (61.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 57%, 66%) and shade (26.5%, 95% CI 22%, 31%) were the most frequently reported protection methods. Parents reported higher rates of protection for younger children and children who sunburn easily. CONCLUSIONS: Parents report that a large proportion of white children is protected from sun exposure by one or more methods. Health care providers and educators might encourage the use of all methods of protection, not just sunscreen use, and educate older children to protect themselves from the sun.
Authors: Guillermo De Castro-Maqueda; J V Gutierrez-Manzanedo; J G Ponce-González; J R Fernandez-Santos; M Linares-Barrios; M De Troya-Martín Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: David B Buller; Kim D Reynolds; Jeff L Ashley; Mary K Buller; Ilima L Kane; Cheri L Stabell; Kim L Massie; Xia Liu; Gary R Cutter Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2011-09 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Ellen R Gritz; Mary K Tripp; Susan K Peterson; Alexander V Prokhorov; Sanjay S Shete; Diana L Urbauer; Bryan M Fellman; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Tom D Thacher; Philip R Fischer; Peter J Tebben; Ravinder J Singh; Stephen S Cha; Julie A Maxson; Barbara P Yawn Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Mary K Tripp; Susan K Peterson; Alexander V Prokhorov; Sanjay S Shete; Jeffrey E Lee; Jeffrey E Gershenwald; Ellen R Gritz Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Karen Glanz; Frances McCarty; Eric J Nehl; David L O'Riordan; Peter Gies; Lucja Bundy; Adam E Locke; Dawn M Hall Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christina M Correnti; David J Klein; Marc N Elliott; Emir Veledar; Mona Saraiya; Alyna T Chien; David C Schwebel; Sylvie Mrug; Susan R Tortolero; Paula M Cuccaro; Mark A Schuster; Suephy C Chen Journal: Pediatr Dermatol Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 1.588
Authors: Gun Ho Lee; Gordon H Bae; Leandra A Barnes; Marlyanne M Pol-Rodriguez; Katherine J Ransohoff; Kristin M Nord; Ying Lu; Brad Cannell; Julie C Weitlauf Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 2.261