OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response of human cholangoicarcinoma cells to TMX treatment through the Fas pathway by pretreatment with IFN-gamma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Cholangiocarcinoma remains one of the most difficult tumors to treat in clinical medicine. Currently, there are no effective chemotherapy treatments for this disease. Surgery offers the only opportunity for a cure, with the majority of patients failing to qualify for such treatment. This study seeks to evaluate a potential new modality for treatment of this disease. METHODS: Human cholangiocarcinoma cells were treated with anti Fas mab and sorted to two populations (Fas-positive and Fas-negative) by FAC analysis. In vitro individual cell populations were pretreated with IFN-gamma 250 units/mL x 18hs. The treated cells assayed for caspase 3, 7, 8, Bak, and for apoptosis with Annexin V after treatment with or without TMX. In Vivo 2 x 106 5 SK-ChA-1 Fas-negative cells were injected into nude mice for development of tumor xenografts. Mice received either no treatment or intra tumor IFN-gamma and/or intra peritoneal TMX. RESULTS: More than 90% (90% +/- 3.5%) of Fas-positive and 70% (71 +/- 2.3%) of Fas-negative cells underwent apoptosis after TMX treatment when pretreated with IFN-gamma. In contrast, TMX alone and IFN-gamma alone stimulated apoptosis by only 22% (22 +/- 3%) P <.00013, and 17% (17 +/- 2%) P <.0001 in Fas-ve cells respectively. In vivo human cholangiocarcinomas xenograft growth was significantly inhibited by a combination of TMX + IFN-gamma compared to controls P <.0007. CONCLUSION: TMX exposure to human cholangiocarcinoma after pretreatment with IFN-gamma allows for induction of apoptosis in vitro and significant inhibition tumor xenograft growth. The combination of these two compounds may provide novel treatment regimen for cholangiocarcinoma.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the response of human cholangoicarcinoma cells to TMX treatment through the Fas pathway by pretreatment with IFN-gamma. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Cholangiocarcinoma remains one of the most difficult tumors to treat in clinical medicine. Currently, there are no effective chemotherapy treatments for this disease. Surgery offers the only opportunity for a cure, with the majority of patients failing to qualify for such treatment. This study seeks to evaluate a potential new modality for treatment of this disease. METHODS:Humancholangiocarcinoma cells were treated with anti Fas mab and sorted to two populations (Fas-positive and Fas-negative) by FAC analysis. In vitro individual cell populations were pretreated with IFN-gamma 250 units/mL x 18hs. The treated cells assayed for caspase 3, 7, 8, Bak, and for apoptosis with Annexin V after treatment with or without TMX. In Vivo 2 x 106 5 SK-ChA-1 Fas-negative cells were injected into nude mice for development of tumor xenografts. Mice received either no treatment or intra tumorIFN-gamma and/or intra peritoneal TMX. RESULTS: More than 90% (90% +/- 3.5%) of Fas-positive and 70% (71 +/- 2.3%) of Fas-negative cells underwent apoptosis after TMX treatment when pretreated with IFN-gamma. In contrast, TMX alone and IFN-gamma alone stimulated apoptosis by only 22% (22 +/- 3%) P <.00013, and 17% (17 +/- 2%) P <.0001 in Fas-ve cells respectively. In vivo humancholangiocarcinomas xenograft growth was significantly inhibited by a combination of TMX + IFN-gamma compared to controls P <.0007. CONCLUSION:TMX exposure to humancholangiocarcinoma after pretreatment with IFN-gamma allows for induction of apoptosis in vitro and significant inhibition tumor xenograft growth. The combination of these two compounds may provide novel treatment regimen for cholangiocarcinoma.
Authors: N K Ossina; A Cannas; V C Powers; P A Fitzpatrick; J D Knight; J R Gilbert; E M Shekhtman; L D Tomei; S R Umansky; M C Kiefer Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1997-06-27 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: G Pan; S M Vickers; A Pickens; J O Phillips; W Ying; J A Thompson; G P Siegal; J M McDonald Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M Hahne; D Rimoldi; M Schröter; P Romero; M Schreier; L E French; P Schneider; T Bornand; A Fontana; D Lienard; J Cerottini; J Tschopp Journal: Science Date: 1996-11-22 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Victor J Hassid; Frank A Orlando; Ziad T Awad; Dongfeng Tan; Thaer Khoury; Bestoun H Ahmed; Sadir J Alrawi Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Bliss J Chang; Alexandra B Samal; Jiri Vlach; Timothy F Fernandez; Dewey Brooke; Peter E Prevelige; Jamil S Saad Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 3.240